Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036361›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2021

Survey on utilization of flattening filter-free photon beams in Japan.

Takumi Kodama, Keisuke Yasui, Shie Nishioka, Kazunori Miyaura, Toru Takakura, Tetsurou Katayose, Mitsuhiro Nakamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takumi KodamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Ooazakomuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun, Saitama 362-0806, Japan.
Keisuke YasuiFaculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Science, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan.
Shie NishiokaDepartment of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kazunori MiyauraGraduate School of Health Sciences, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Toru TakakuraDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, 145 Ishibashi, Makichima-cho, Uji-shi, Kyoto 611-0041, Japan.
Tetsurou KatayoseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Information Technology and Medical engineering, Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology QA/QC 2018-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the current state of flattening filter-free (FFF) beam implementation in C-arm linear accelerators (LINAC) in Japan, the quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) 2018-2019 Committee of the Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) conducted a 37-question survey, designed to investigate facility information and specifications regarding FFF beam adoption and usage. The survey comprised six sections: facility information, devices, clinical usage, standard calibration protocols, modeling for treatment planning (TPS) systems and commissioning and QA/QC. A web-based questionnaire was developed. Responses were collected between 18 June and 18 September 2019. Of the 846 institutions implementing external radiotherapy, 323 replied. Of these institutions, 92 had adopted FFF beams and 66 had treated patients using them. FFF beams were used in stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) for almost all disease sites, especially for the lungs using 6 MV and liver using 10 MV in 51 and 32 institutions, respectively. The number of institutions using FFF beams for treatment increased yearly, from eight before 2015 to 60 in 2018. Farmer-type ionization chambers were used as the standard calibration protocol in 66 (72%) institutions. In 73 (80%) institutions, the beam-quality conversion factor for FFF beams was calculated from TPR20,10, via the same protocol used for beams with flattening filter (WFF). Commissioning, periodic QA and patient-specific QA for FFF beams also followed the procedures used for WFF beams. FFF beams were primarily used in high-volume centers for SRT. In most institutions, measurement and QA was conducted via the procedures used for WFF beams.

Indexed as

PhotonsSurveys and QuestionnairesCalibrationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansJapanParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedflattening filter-free (FFF) beamsmeasurement protocolssurveyutilization for treatment

Identifiers

PMID34036361
PMCPMC8273795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.