Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036317›Full record

ArticleBlood2021

Invariant natural killer T-cell subsets have diverse graft-versus-host-disease-preventing and antitumor effects.

Kristina Maas-Bauer, Juliane K Lohmeyer, Toshihito Hirai, Teresa Lopes Ramos, Furqan M Fazal, Ulrike M Litzenburger, Kathryn E Yost, Jessica V Ribado, Neeraja Kambham, Arielle S Wenokur and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic graft-versus-host disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Annals of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Innate immune cells in chimeric antigen receptor therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Graft-Versus-Host Disease Mouse Models: A Clinical-Translational Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Markers and makers of NKT17 cells.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristina Maas-BauerDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1788-2807
Juliane K LohmeyerDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-0317
Toshihito HiraiDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Teresa Lopes RamosDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-7197
Furqan M FazalCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes.
Ulrike M LitzenburgerCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes.
Kathryn E YostCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-950X
Jessica V RibadoDepartment of Genetics, and.
Neeraja KambhamDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Arielle S WenokurDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-6451-6140
Po-Yu LinDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Maite AlvarezDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5969-9181
Melissa MaversDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Jeanette BakerDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Ami S BhattDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-2975
Howard Y ChangCenter for Personal Dynamic Regulomes.
Federico SimonettaDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Robert S NegrinDivision of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Stanford Blood Center · USDynamic Imaging (United Kingdom) · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

TUMOR SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IN BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONP01CA049605 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Robert S Negrin · 1989 to 2026
$73.3M
TLI/ATG CONDTIONING: KIDNEY/BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTSP01HL075462 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLEMAN, EDGAR G. · 2004 to 2020
$27.9M
Special EquipmentP50HG007735 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y · 2014 to 2018
$15.2M
Center for Personal Dynamic RegulomesRM1HG007735 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHANG, HOWARD Y · 2019 to 2023
$13.8M
Immunosuppressive human invariant natural killer T cells for prevention of graft-versus-host diseaseK08HL151809 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MAVERS, MELISSA · 2020 to 2024
$833k
High Throughput DNA Sequencer UpgradeS10OD018220 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, JOHN · 2014 to 2014
$596k
BD Canto II RUO CytometerS10RR027431 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2010 to 2010
$236k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049605NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027431NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG007735NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG007735NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL151809NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL075462NIH HHS S10 OD018220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are a T-cell subset with potent immunomodulatory properties. Experimental evidence in mice and observational studies in humans indicate that iNKT cells have antitumor potential as well as the ability to suppress acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Murine iNKT cells differentiate during thymic development into iNKT1, iNKT2, and iNKT17 sublineages, which differ transcriptomically and epigenomically and have subset-specific developmental requirements. Whether distinct iNKT sublineages also differ in their antitumor effect and their ability to suppress GVHD is currently unknown. In this work, we generated highly purified murine iNKT sublineages, characterized their transcriptomic and epigenomic landscape, and assessed specific functions. We show that iNKT2 and iNKT17, but not iNKT1, cells efficiently suppress T-cell activation in vitro and mitigate murine acute GVHD in vivo. Conversely, we show that iNKT1 cells display the highest antitumor activity against murine B-cell lymphoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we report for the first time that iNKT sublineages have distinct and different functions, with iNKT1 cells having the highest antitumor activity and iNKT2 and iNKT17 cells having immune-regulatory properties. These results have important implications for the translation of iNKT cell therapies to the clinic for cancer immunotherapy as well as for the prevention and treatment of GVHD.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseLymphocyte ActivationLymphoma, B-CellNeoplasms, ExperimentalAnimalsEpigenomicsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGraft vs Tumor EffectMaleMiceNatural Killer T-Cells

Identifiers

PMID34036317
PMCPMC8432044
OpenAlexW3165803117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.