ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- )2020
Diagnostic Prediction with Sequence-of-sets Representation Learning for Clinical Events.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eleven quick tips for Biomedical Federated Learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Event co-occurrences for prompt-based generative event argument extraction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- AdaDiag: Adversarial Domain Adaptation of Diagnostic Prediction with Clinical Event Sequences.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- Unsupervised Event Graph Representation and Similarity Learning on Biomedical Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) contain both ordered and unordered chronologies of clinical events that occur during a patient encounter. However, during data preprocessing steps, many predictive models impose a predefined order on unordered clinical events sets (e.g., alphabetical, natural order from the chart, etc.), which is potentially incompatible with the temporal nature of the sequence and predictive task. To address this issue, we propose DPSS, which seeks to capture each patient's clinical event records as sequences of event sets. For each clinical event set, we assume that the predictive model should be invariant to the order of concurrent events and thus employ a novel permutation sampling mechanism. This paper evaluates the use of this permuted sampling method given different data-driven models for predicting a heart failure (HF) diagnosis in subsequent patient visits. Experimental results using the MIMIC-III dataset show that the permutation sampling mechanism offers improved discriminative power based on the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (pr-AUC) metrics as HF diagnosis prediction becomes more robust to different data ordering schemes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.