Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036267›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

The Modified Early Warning Score: A Useful Marker of Neurological Worsening but Unreliable Predictor of Sepsis in the Neurocritically Ill-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Jeannette Hester, Teddy S Youn, Erin Trifilio, Christopher P Robinson, Marc-Alain Babi, Pouya Ameli, William Roth, Sebastian Gatica, Michael A Pizzi, Aimee Gennaro and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannette HesterDepartment of Nursing and Patient Services, Neurointensive Care Unit, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL.
Teddy S YounBarrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Erin TrifilioDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Christopher P RobinsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Marc-Alain BabiDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Pouya AmeliDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
William RothDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Sebastian GaticaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Michael A PizziDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Aimee GennaroDepartment of Pharmacy Services, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL.
Charles CrescioniQuality and Patient Safety, UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL.
Carolina B MacielDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Katharina M BuslDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USUF Health Shands Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the performance of the Modified Early Warning Score and Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score to predict sepsis, morbidity, and mortality in neurocritically ill patients.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingSingle tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients admitted to the neuro-ICU from January 2013 to December 2016.

interventionsObservational study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBaseline and clinical characteristics, infections/sepsis, neurologic worsening, and mortality were abstracted. Primary outcomes included new infection/sepsis, escalation of care, and mortality. Patients with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score/Modified Early Warning Score greater than or equal to 5 were compared with those with scores less than 5. 5. Of 7,286 patients, Of 7,286 patients, 1,120 had Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score greater than or equal to 5. Of those, mean age was 58.9 years; 50.2% were male. Inhospitality mortality was 22.1% for patients (248/1,120) with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score greater than or equal to 5, compared with 6.1% (379/6,166) with Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score less than 5. Sepsis was present in 5.6% (345/6,166) when Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score less than 5 versus 14.3% (160/1,120) when greater than or equal to 5, and Modified Early Warning Score elevation led to a new sepsis diagnosis in 5.5% (62/1,120). Three-hundred forty-three patients (30.6%) had neurologic worsening at the time of Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score elevation. Utilizing the original Modified Early Warning Score, results were similar, with less score thresholds met (836/7,286) and slightly weaker associations.

conclusionsIn neurocritical ill patients, Modified Early Warning Score-Sepsis Recognition Score and Modified Early Warning Score are associated with higher inhospital mortality and are preferentially triggered in setting of neurologic worsening. They are less reliable in identifying new infection or sepsis in this patient population. Population-specific adjustment of early warning scores may be necessary for the neurocritically ill patient population.

Indexed as

early warning scoresneurocritical careneurologic deteriorationoutcome predictionrapid response scoressepsisseverity scores

Identifiers

PMID34036267
PMCPMC8133042
OpenAlexW3161251600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.