Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036144›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding to rabies and its prevention and control among bite victims by suspected rabid animals in China.

Dandan Li, Qiaoyan Liu, Fan Chen, Qingqing Jiang, Tiantian Wang, Xiaoxv Yin, Zuxun Lu, Shiyi Cao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dandan LiSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiaoyan LiuResearch Institute of Rehabilitation Information, China Rehabilitation Science Institute, Beijing, China.
Fan ChenSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qingqing JiangSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tiantian WangSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaoxv YinSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zuxun LuSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shiyi CaoSchool of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNChina Rehabilitation Research Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a major public health problem and the incidence of suspected rabid animal bites remains high in China. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about rabies of bite victims in Wuhan, China. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1015 bite victims visiting rabies prevention clinics. We performed a face-to-face interview to investigate the rabies KAP of these victims using a self-designed questionnaire. Factors associated with the KAP were evaluated using logistic regression models. Only 56.85% of respondents knew that rabies is infectious. More than 20% of respondents thought that it is not necessary to vaccinate dogs and cats against rabies usually. About 70% of participants stated that they never need to be reminded to vaccinate when they were bitten. Lower education level (odds ratio [OR] = 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.65-5.38 for secondary school or less and OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.28-2.38 for high school or vocational school,

Indexed as

Associated factorBite victimsChinaKnowledge-attitudes-practicesRabies

Identifiers

PMID34036144
PMCPMC8135036
OpenAlexW3165450484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.