Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036136›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2021

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in gynecologic oncology.

Tanvi V Joshi, Shaina F Bruce, Rod Grim, Tommy Buchanan, Sudeshna Chatterjee-Paer, Elizabeth R Burton, Joel I Sorosky, Mark S Shahin, Mitchell I Edelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanvi V JoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
Shaina F BruceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
Rod GrimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States.
Tommy BuchananHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Sudeshna Chatterjee-PaerHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Elizabeth R BurtonHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Joel I SoroskyHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Mark S ShahinHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Mitchell I EdelsonHanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States.
Abington Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach that aims to reduce narcotic use and maintain anabolic balance to enable full functional recovery. Our primary aim was to determine the effect of ERAS on narcotic usage among patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy by gynecologic oncologists. We characterized its effect on length of stay, intraoperative blood transfusions, bowel function, 30-day readmissions, and postoperative complications. A retrospective cohort study was performed at Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health in gynecologic oncology. Women who underwent an exploratory laparotomy from 2011 to 2016 for both benign and malignant etiologies were included before and after implementation of our ERAS protocol. Patients who underwent a bowel resection were excluded. A total of 724 patients were included: 360 in the non-ERAS and 364 in the ERAS cohort. An overall reduction in narcotic usage, measured as oral morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) was observed in the ERAS relative to the non-ERAS group, during the entire hospital stay (MME 34 versus 68, p < 0.001 and within 72 h postoperatively (MME 34 versus 60, p < 0.005). A shorter length of stay and earlier return of bowel function were also observed in the ERAS group. No differences in 30-day readmissions (p = 0.967) or postoperative complications (p = 0.328) were observed. This study demonstrated the benefits of ERAS in Gynecologic Oncology. A significant reduction of postoperative narcotic use, earlier return of bowel function and a shorter postoperative hospital stay was seen in the ERAS compared to traditional perioperative care.

Indexed as

Enhanced RecoveryERASPerioperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34036136
PMCPMC8134956
OpenAlexW3159042642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.