Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34036100›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

Medicinal Plants with Prospective Benefits in the Management of Peptic Ulcer Diseases in Ghana.

Mavis Boakye-Yiadom, Doris Kumadoh, Emmanuel Adase, Eric Woode

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mavis Boakye-YiadomClinical Research Department, Centre for Plant Medicine Research, Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-1672
Doris KumadohDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Centre for Plant Medicine Research, Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-4337
Emmanuel AdaseDepartment of Production, Centre for Plant Medicine Research, Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-2573
Eric WoodeDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Private Mail Bag, Volta Region, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2182-5736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growth or multiplication of harmful microorganisms in addition to harmful human activities has led to many disorders in humans. Consequently, there is a search for medications to treat these disorders. Interestingly, medicines of plant origin are known to be among the most attractive sources of new drugs and have shown promising results in the treatment of various diseases including peptic ulcers. This review, therefore, is aimed at obtaining knowledge on some Ghanaian ethnomedicinal plants used to treat peptic ulcers, their folkloric uses, their phytochemicals, and their antiulcer and related pharmacological activities as well as finding areas for prospective studies.

methodsPublished peer-reviewed articles on ethnomedicinal plants used for the management of peptic ulcers in Ghana from 1967 to 2020 were sourced and used for the study.

resultsIn this review, 13 plants were identified which belong to 10 different families including Sapindaceae, Apocynaceae, and Bignoniaceae. The parts most often used for most preparations were the leaves (53%), followed by stem bark and roots (both having the same percentage of use of 17.6%), the whole plant (5.9%), and the rhizomes (5.9%).

Indexed as

AnimalsApocynaceaeAzadirachtaBignoniaceaeDatabases, FactualGhanaHumansMedicine, TraditionalPeptic UlcerPhytochemicalsPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesPlants, MedicinalProspective StudiesSapindaceaePhytochemicalsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID34036100
PMCPMC8118747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.