Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035878›Full record

ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2021

Green Tea (

Pamela N Modesto, Bertha F Polegato, Priscila P Dos Santos, Leticia D V Grassi, Leticia C C Molina, Silmeia G Z Bazan, Elenize J Pereira, Ana Angelica H Fernandes, Alexandre T Fabro, Vickeline N Androcioli and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Pharmaceutical biology · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela N ModestoInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-1465
Bertha F PolegatoInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2875-9532
Priscila P Dos SantosInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Leticia D V GrassiInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Leticia C C MolinaInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Silmeia G Z BazanInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Elenize J PereiraInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Ana Angelica H FernandesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Alexandre T FabroDepartment of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (UNESP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Vickeline N AndrocioliExperimental Research Unit (UNIPEX), Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Meliza G RoscaniMedicine Department, São Carlos Federal University, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Sergio A R de PaivaInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Leonardo A M ZornoffInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Marcos F MinicucciInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Paula S AzevedoInternal Medicine Department, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCentro Universitário de João Pessoa · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental studies have shown the action of green tea in modulating cardiac remodeling. However, the effects of green tea on the cardiac remodeling process induced by doxorubicin (DOX) are not known. Therefore, this study is aimed at evaluating whether green tea extract could attenuate DOX-induced cardiac remodeling, assessed by cardiac morphological and functional changes and associated with the evaluation of different modulators of cardiac remodeling. The animals were divided into four groups: the control group (C), the green tea group (GT), the DOX group (D), and the DOX and green tea group (DGT). Groups C and GT received intraperitoneal sterile saline injections, D and DGT received intraperitoneal injections of DOX, and GT and DGT were fed chow supplemented with green tea extract for 35 days prior to DOX injection. After forty-eight hours, we performed an echocardiogram and euthanasia and collected the materials for analysis. Green tea attenuated DOX-induced cardiotoxicity by increasing cardiac function and decreasing the concentric remodeling. Treatment with DOX increased oxidative stress in the heart, marked by a higher level of lipid hydroperoxide (LH) and lower levels of antioxidant enzymes. Treatment with green tea increased the antioxidant enzymes' activity and decreased the production of LH. Green tea extract increased the expression of Top2-

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsAntioxidantsCamellia sinensisDisease Models, AnimalDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDoxorubicinMaleRatsRats, WistarVentricular RemodelingAntioxidantsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDoxorubicin

Identifiers

PMID34035878
PMCPMC8116148
OpenAlexW3157177905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.