Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035871›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2021

Biostimulatory Effects of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Associated Pain, Applied at 3-Week Intervals: A Split-Mouth Study.

Irfan Qamruddin, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Verda Mahroof, Meenaz Karim, Mubassar Fida, Mohd Fadhli Khamis, Adam Husein

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06026930 (Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06026930 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Different Orthodontic Tooth Movements: A Comparative Clinical Investigation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Azhar UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled82ConditionsEffect of Low Level Laser Versus Low Intensity Pulsed Ultra Sound on Rate of Different Orthodontic Tooth Movement by MillimeterArmslow-level laser therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irfan QamruddinHead of Orthodontic Department, Sindh Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5179-7780
Mohammad Khursheed AlamOrthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72721, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-1752
Verda MahroofOrthodontic Department, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3750-5518
Meenaz KarimProsthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-3102
Mubassar FidaOrthodontics Residency Programme, Section of Dental Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4842-9896
Mohd Fadhli KhamisOral Biology Unit, School of Dental Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-7995
Adam HuseinProsthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5962-6110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a noninvasive modality to stimulate bone remodeling (BR) and the healing of hard and soft tissues. This research evaluates the biostimulatory effect of LIPUS on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and associated pain, when applied at 3-week intervals. Methods: Twenty-two patients (11 males and 11 females; mean age 19.18 ± 2.00 years) having Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion needing bilateral extractions of maxillary first bicuspids were recruited for this split-mouth randomized clinical trial. After the initial stage of alignment and leveling with contemporary edgewise MBT (McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi) prescription brackets (Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, Calif) of 22 mil, followed by extractions of premolars bilaterally, 6 mm nickel-titanium spring was used to retract the canines separately by applying 150 g force on 0.019 × 0.025-in stainless steel working archwires. LIPUS (1.1 MHz frequency and 30 mW/cm Results: No significant difference in the rate of canine movement was found among the experimental (0.90 mm ± 0.33 mm) and placebo groups (0.81 mm ± 0.32 mm). There was no difference in pain reduction between experimental and placebo groups ( Conclusion: Single-dose application of LIPUS at 3-week intervals is ineffective in stimulating the OTM and reducing associated treatment pain.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusion, Angle Class IIMouthNickelPakistanTime FactorsTitaniumToothacheTooth Movement TechniquesUltrasonic WavesYoung AdultNickelTitaniumtitanium nickelide

Identifiers

PMID34035871
PMCPMC8118727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.