ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2021
Clinically integrated breastfeeding peer counseling and breastfeeding outcomes.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants and strategies influencing implementation of a clinically integrated breastfeeding peer counseling program: an application of the Implementation Research Logic Model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Workflow Changes on a Clinically-Integrated Breastfeeding Peer Counselor Program.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Implementation of a clinically integrated breastfeeding peer counselor program.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- The role of clinic-based breastfeeding peer counseling on breastfeeding rates among low-income patients.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Experiences of breastfeeding peer counseling among women with low incomes in the US: a qualitative evaluation.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States: data insights from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether clinically integrated breastfeeding peer counseling (ci-BPC) improved breastfeeding outcomes for a diverse cohort of Medicaid-enrolled patients. STUDY
designMedical records were reviewed for a random subset of patients delivering 2014-2015 (baseline, N = 147) and 2017-2019 (post-implementation, N = 281). Chi-squared and logistic regression evaluated differences in breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration, and results were stratified by race/ethnicity.
resultsPost-implementation, 90.4% of patients received ci-BPC. Compared to baseline, documented prenatal breastfeeding counseling increased from 5 to 84% (<0.001), and inpatient counseling increased from 12 to 55% (p < 0.001). Breastfeeding initiation was similar (86 to 89%, p = 0.28), while exclusivity increased from 21 to 31% (p = 0.03). Any breastfeeding ≥6 weeks increased from 29 to 65% (p < 0.001) and was most improved for Black (32 to 50%, p < 0.01) and Latinx patients (37 to 71%, p < 0.01).
conclusionsci-BPC was associated with significant improvement in breastfeeding exclusivity and duration, and may address breastfeeding disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34035450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.