ArticleScientific reports2021
IMP3 protein is an independent prognostic factor of clinical stage II rectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- ITGA5 promotes cervical cancer progression by regulating IMP3 recruitment of HK2 mRNA.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Identification of a Novel Intracellular Function of the Secreted Ribonuclease RNASE1 in Inhibiting Gene Expression.Molecular and cellular biology · 2025Article
- Targeting IGF2BP3 in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A novel tumour enhancer function of Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding protein 3 in colorectal cancer.Cell death & disease · 2023Article
- IGF2BP3 overexpression predicts poor prognosis and correlates with immune infiltration in bladder cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- CircARID1A binds to IGF2BP3 in gastric cancer and promotes cancer proliferation by forming a circARID1A-IGF2BP3-SLC7A5 RNA-protein ternary complex.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunohistochemical level of IMP3-protein in patients with rectal cancer in clinical stage II (141), were correlated with sociodemographic, pathohistological and clinical indicators and duration of overall-survival and progression-free-survival. Vascular invasion was associated with IMP3-positive immunostaining (p < 0.001). Vascular invasion ratio in the group of poorly-differentiated-tumors was 21 times higher than in the group of well-differentiated-tumors. IMP3-positive patients lived 2.2 times shorter than negative (p < 0.001). Patients with well-differentiated-tumors lived 1.7 times longer than the subjects with poorly-differentiated-tumors (p < 0.001). Patients without vascular invasion lived 2.7 times longer than the subjects with vascular invasion (p < 0.001). The risk of mortality was 2.3 times higher for IMP3 positive patients (p = 0.027) and 10.4 higher for the patients with vascular invasion (p < 0.001). IMP3-negative participants had 2.3 times longer free interval without disease (p < 0.001). The free interval without disease was 3.6 times longer in the group without vascular invasion (p < 0.001). The risk of disease relapse in the IMP3 positive group was 5.3 times higher (p < 0.001) and with vascular invasion was 8 times longer (p < 0.001). The risk of disease relapse was 6.8 times higher in the group with vascular invasion (p < 0.001). Patients with rectal cancer and high IMP3-protein level will have a shorter overall survival relative to patients without or with low levels of IMP3. The analysis of IMP3 expression by immunohistochemistry pointed IMP3 as an independent prognostic factor of clinical stage II rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.