Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Autopsy-diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia cases support the use of cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers in the diagnostic work-up.

Magdalena Bruzova, Robert Rusina, Zuzana Stejskalova, Radoslav Matej

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena BruzovaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague 4 - Krc, Czech Republic.
Robert RusinaDepartment of Neurology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana StejskalovaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague 4 - Krc, Czech Republic.
Radoslav MatejDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Videnska 800, 14059, Prague 4 - Krc, Czech Republic. radoslav.matej@ftn.cz.
Charles University · CZThomayer University Hospital · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various proteins play a decisive role in the pathology of different neurodegenerative diseases. Nonetheless, most of these proteins can only be detected during a neuropathological assessment, although some non-specific biomarkers are routinely tested for in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a part of the differential diagnosis of dementia. In antemortem CSF samples from 117 patients with different types of neuropathologically confirmed neurodegenerative disease with dementia, we assessed total-tau (t-tau), phosphorylated-tau (181P) (p-tau), amyloid-beta (1-42) (Aβ42), TAR DNA binding protein (TDP)-43, progranulin (PGRN), and neurofilament light (NfL) chain levels, and positivity of protein 14-3-3. We found t-tau levels and the t-tau/p-tau ratios were significantly higher in prion diseases compared to the other neurodegenerative diseases. Statistically significant differences in the t-tau/Aβ42 ratio predominantly corresponded to t-tau levels in prion diseases and Aβ42 levels in AD. TDP-43 levels were significantly lower in prion diseases. Additionally, the TDP-43/Aβ42 ratio was better able to distinguish Alzheimer's disease from other neurodegenerative diseases compared to using Aβ42 alone. In frontotemporal lobar degeneration, PRGN levels were significantly higher in comparison to other neurodegenerative diseases. There is an increasing need for biomarkers suitable for diagnostic workups for neurodegenerative diseases. It appears that adding TDP-43 and PGRN to the testing panel for neurodegenerative diseases could improve the resolution of differential diagnoses.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloid beta-PeptidesAutopsyBiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurofilament Proteins14-3-3 ProteinsAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)BiomarkersCerebrospinal Fluid ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGRN protein, humanMAPT protein, humanneurofilament protein LNeurofilament ProteinsPeptide FragmentsProgranulinsTARDBP protein, humantau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34035398
PMCPMC8149718
OpenAlexW3164730415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.