Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035322›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

COVID-19 infection data encode a dynamic reproduction number in response to policy decisions with secondary wave implications.

Michael A Rowland, Todd M Swannack, Michael L Mayo, Matthew Parno, Matthew Farthing, Ian Dettwiller, Glover George, William England, Molly Reif, Jeffrey Cegan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Will AI Shape the Future of Pandemic Response? Early Clues From Data Analytics.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael A RowlandU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA. Michael.A.Rowland@usace.army.mil.
Todd M SwannackU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Michael L MayoU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Matthew ParnoU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Hanover, NH, USA.
Matthew FarthingU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Ian DettwillerU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Glover GeorgeU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
William EnglandU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Molly ReifU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Jeffrey CeganU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA, USA.
Benjamin TrumpU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA, USA.
Igor LinkovU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA, USA.
Brandon LaffertyU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Todd BridgesU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has spread to populations throughout the continental United States. Most state and local governments have adopted some level of "social distancing" policy, but infections have continued to spread despite these efforts. Absent a vaccine, authorities have few other tools by which to mitigate further spread of the virus. This begs the question of how effective social policy really is at reducing new infections that, left alone, could potentially overwhelm the existing hospitalization capacity of many states. We developed a mathematical model that captures correlations between some state-level "social distancing" policies and infection kinetics for all U.S. states, and use it to illustrate the link between social policy decisions, disease dynamics, and an effective reproduction number that changes over time, for case studies of Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Washington states. In general, our findings indicate that the potential for second waves of infection, which result after reopening states without an increase to immunity, can be mitigated by a return of social distancing policies as soon as possible after the waves are detected.

Indexed as

Health PolicyCOVID-19Databases, FactualHumansMassachusettsNew JerseyPhysical DistancingPublic PolicySARS-CoV-2Washington

Identifiers

PMID34035322
PMCPMC8149655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.