Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035273›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

In vivo partial reprogramming of myofibers promotes muscle regeneration by remodeling the stem cell niche.

Chao Wang, Ruben Rabadan Ros, Paloma Martinez-Redondo, Zaijun Ma, Lei Shi, Yuan Xue, Isabel Guillen-Guillen, Ling Huang, Tomoaki Hishida, Hsin-Kai Liao and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A cross-talk between p16High senescence and cellular reprogramming.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Making sense of MYC in skeletal muscle: location, duration, and magnitude.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025
    Review
  16. Mammalian Blastema: Possibility and Potentials.International journal of stem cells · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chao WangGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ruben Rabadan RosGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Paloma Martinez-RedondoGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Zaijun MaGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Lei ShiGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Yuan XueGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Isabel Guillen-GuillenGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ling HuangIntegrative Genomics and Bioinformatics Core, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Tomoaki HishidaGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hsin-Kai LiaoGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Estrella Nuñez DelicadoUniversidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Campus de los Jerónimos, Guadalupe, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0554-2365
Concepcion Rodriguez EstebanGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Pedro Guillen-GarciaDepartment of Traumatology and Research Unit, Clinica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain.
Pradeep ReddyGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9173-3845
Juan Carlos Izpisua BelmonteGene Expression Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA. belmonte@salk.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0557-8875
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · USClínica Rementería · ESUniversidad Católica de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term, systemic expression of the Yamanaka reprogramming factors (Oct-3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc [OSKM]) has been shown to rejuvenate aging cells and promote tissue regeneration in vivo. However, the mechanisms by which OSKM promotes tissue regeneration are unknown. In this work, we focus on a specific tissue and demonstrate that local expression of OSKM, specifically in myofibers, induces the activation of muscle stem cells or satellite cells (SCs), which accelerates muscle regeneration in young mice. In contrast, expressing OSKM directly in SCs does not improve muscle regeneration. Mechanistically, expressing OSKM in myofibers regulates the expression of genes important for the SC microenvironment, including upregulation of p21, which in turn downregulates Wnt4. This is critical because Wnt4 is secreted by myofibers to maintain SC quiescence. Thus, short-term induction of the Yamanaka factors in myofibers may promote tissue regeneration by modifying the stem cell niche.

Indexed as

Stem Cell NicheAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingFemaleGene ExpressionKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMice, TransgenicMyofibrilsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRegenerationSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleSOXB1 Transcription FactorsKlf4 protein, mouseKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSOXB1 Transcription FactorsWnt4 Protein

Identifiers

PMID34035273
PMCPMC8149870
OpenAlexW3165546848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.