Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34035101›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Trends in health expectancies: a systematic review of international evidence.

Gemma F Spiers, Tafadzwa Patience Kunonga, Fiona Beyer, Dawn Craig, Barbara Hanratty, Carol Jagger

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cohort Differences in Physical Health and Disability in the United States and Europe.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gemma F SpiersPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK gemma-frances.spiers@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2121-4529
Tafadzwa Patience KunongaPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6193-1365
Fiona BeyerPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Dawn CraigPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barbara HanrattyPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-7190
Carol JaggerPopulation & Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1The Dunhill Medical Trust RPGF1806/44
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA clear understanding of whether increases in longevity are spent in good health is necessary to support ageing, health and care-related policy.

designWe conducted a systematic review to update and summarise evidence on trends in health expectancies, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) high-income countries. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, 1946-19 September 2019; Embase 1980-2019 week 38; Scopus 1966-22 September 2019, Health Management Information Consortium, 1979-September 2019), and the UK Office for National Statistics website (November 2019). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language studies published from 2016 that reported trends in healthy, active and/or disability-free life expectancy in an OECD high-income country. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Records were screened independently by two researchers. Study quality was assessed using published criteria designed to identify sources of bias in studies reporting trends, and evidence summarised by narrative synthesis.

findingsTwenty-eight publications from 11 countries were included, covering periods from 6 to 40 years, between 1970 and 2017. In most countries, gains in healthy and disability-free life expectancy do not match the growth in total life expectancy. Exceptions were demonstrated for women in Sweden, where there were greater gains in disability-free years than life expectancy. Gains in healthy and disability-free life expectancy were greater for men than women in most countries except the USA (age 85), Japan (birth), Korea (age 65) and Sweden (age 77).

conclusionAn expansion of disability in later life is evident in a number of high-income countries, with implications for the sustainability of health and care systems. The recent COVID-19 pandemic may also impact health expectancies in the longer term.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanLife ExpectancyMaleRepublic of KoreaSARS-CoV-2Swedengeriatric medicinehealth policyorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID34035101
PMCPMC8154999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.