Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34034821›Full record

Trial reportAddiction science & clinical practice2021

Facilitating rapid access to addiction treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Anita Srivastava, Sarah Clarke, Kate Hardy, Meldon Kahan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01934751 (Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Immediate Versus Delayed Access to Hospital-based Addiction Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01934751 naunknown statusnot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Immediate Versus Delayed Access to Hospital-based Addiction Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2013 to 2015Enrolled124ConditionsAlcohol Addiction, Opiate AddictionArmsDelayed Intervention (DI), Rapid Intervention (RI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita SrivastavaUnity Health, Family Medicine, 1st Floor, 30 The Queensway, Toronto, ON, M6R 1B5, Canada.
Sarah ClarkeMETA:PHI, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada. sarah.clarke@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-8427
Kate HardyMETA:PHI, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Meldon KahanSubstance Use Service, Women's College Hospital, 3rd Floor, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Women's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObtaining timely access to addiction medicine treatment for patients with substance use disorders is challenging and patients often have to navigate complex referral pathways. This randomized controlled trial examines the effect of providing an expedited pathway to addiction medicine treatment on initial treatment engagement and health care utilization.

methodsIndividuals with possible alcohol or opioid use disorder were recruited from three residential withdrawal management services (WMS). Subjects randomized to the Delayed Intervention (DI) group were given contact information for a nearby addiction medicine clinic; those randomized to the Rapid Intervention (RI) group were given an appointment at the clinic within 2 days and were accompanied to their first appointment.

resultsOf the 174 individuals who were screened, 106 were randomized to either the DI or RI group. The two groups were similar in demographics, housing status, and substance use in the last 30 days. In the 6-month period following randomization, 85% of the RI group attended at least one clinic appointment, compared to only 29% in the DI group (p < 0.0001). The RI group had a mean of 6.39 ED visits per subject in the 12 months after randomization, while the DI group had a mean of 13.02 ED visits per subject in the same 12-month period (p = 0.0469). Other health utilization measures did not differ between the two groups.

conclusionProviding immediate facilitated access to an addiction medicine service resulted in greater initial engagement and reduced emergency department visits at 6 months. Trial registration This trial is registered at the National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) under identifier #NCT01934751.

Indexed as

Addiction MedicineBehavior, AddictiveOpioid-Related DisordersEmergency Service, HospitalHumansReferral and ConsultationAlcohol use disorderED visitsOpioid use disorderTreatment access

Identifiers

PMID34034821
PMCPMC8152083
OpenAlexW3164716550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.