Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34034761›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2021

Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening.

Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé, Matthew Menear, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, France Légaré

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Titilayo Tatiana AgbadjéCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Matthew MenearCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Marie-Pierre GagnonCentre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.
France LégaréCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-6696
Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CAEnable Ireland · IE

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur team has developed a decision aid to help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening. However, the decision aid is not yet widely available in Quebec's prenatal care pathways.

objectiveWe sought to identify knowledge translation strategies and develop an implementation plan to promote the use of the decision aid in prenatal care services in Quebec, Canada.

methodsGuided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we performed a synthesis of our research (11 publications) on prenatal screening in Quebec and on the decision aid. Two authors independently reviewed the 11 articles, extracted information, and mapped it onto the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Using participatory action research methods, we then recruited pregnant women, health professionals, managers of three prenatal care services, and researchers to (a) identify the different clinical pathways followed by pregnant women and (b) select knowledge translation strategies for a clinical implementation plan. Then, based on all the information gathered, the authors established a consensus on strategies to include in the plan.

resultsOur knowledge synthesis showed that pregnant women and their partners are not sufficiently involved in the decision-making process about prenatal screening and that there are numerous barriers and facilitators of the use of the decision aid in clinical practice (e.g., low intention to use it among health providers). Using a participatory action approach, we met with five pregnant women, three managers, and six health professionals. They informed us about three of Quebec's prenatal care pathways and helped us identify 20 knowledge translation strategies (e.g., nurse discusses decision aid with women before they meet the doctor) to include in a clinical implementation plan. The research team reached a consensus about the clinical plan and also about broader organizational strategies, such as training healthcare providers in the use of the decision aid, monitoring its impact (e.g., measure decisional conflict) and sustaining its use (e.g., engage key stakeholders in the implementation process).

conclusionNext steps are to pilot our implementation plan while further identifying global strategies that target institutional, policy, and systemic supports for implementation.

Indexed as

Down SyndromeDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal DiagnosisDecision aidImplementation planIPDASKnowledge-to-Action FrameworkParticipatory action researchShared decision makingTheoretical Domains Framework

Identifiers

PMID34034761
PMCPMC8152135
OpenAlexW3165509583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.