Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34034753›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.

Chandrasekaran Jayaraman, Chaithanya K Mummidisetty, Mark V Albert, Robert Lipschutz, Shenan Hoppe-Ludwig, Gayatri Mathur, Arun Jayaraman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01537211 (Microprocessor Knee Versus Mechanical Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01537211 nacompletednot on this map

Microprocessor Knee Versus Mechanical Knee: Impact on Functional Outcomes in Dysvascular Transfemoral Amputees

TypeinterventionalSponsorShirley Ryan AbilityLabRan2011 to 2019Enrolled10ConditionsTransfemoral Amputation, Unilateral Traumatic Amputation of Leg at or Above KneeArmsC leg compared to subject's mechanical leg (Otto Bock)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chandrasekaran Jayaraman *Max Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA.
Chaithanya K Mummidisetty *Max Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA.
Mark V AlbertDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Robert LipschutzMax Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA.
Shenan Hoppe-LudwigMax Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA.
Gayatri MathurMax Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA.
Arun JayaramanMax Näder Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA. a-jayaraman@northweseten.edu.
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with transfemoral amputations who are considered to be limited community ambulators are classified as Medicare functional classification (MFCL) level K2. These individuals are usually prescribed a non-microprocessor controlled knee (NMPK) with an appropriate foot for simple walking functions. However, existing research suggests that these individuals can benefit from using a microprocessor controlled knee (MPK) and appropriate foot for their ambulation, but cannot obtain one due to insurance policy restrictions. With a steady increase in older adults with amputations due to vascular conditions, it is critical to evaluate whether advanced prostheses can provide better safety and performance capabilities to maintain and improve quality of life in individuals who are predominantly designated MFCL level K2. To decipher this we conducted a 13 month longitudinal clinical trial to determine the benefits of using a C-Leg and 1M10 foot in individuals at K2 level with transfemoral amputation due to vascular disease. This longitudinal clinical trial incorporated recommendations prescribed by the lower limb prosthesis workgroup to design a study that can add evidence to improve reimbursement policy through clinical outcomes using an MPK in K2 level individuals with transfemoral amputation who were using an NMPK for everyday use.

methodsTen individuals (mean age: 63 ± 9 years) with unilateral transfemoral amputation due to vascular conditions designated as MFCL K2 participated in this longitudinal crossover randomized clinical trial. Baseline outcomes were collected with their current prosthesis. Participants were then randomized to one of two groups, either an intervention with the MPK with a standardized 1M10 foot or their predicate NMPK with a standardized 1M10 foot. On completion of the first intervention, participants crossed over to the next group to complete the study. Each intervention lasted for 6 months (3 months of acclimation and 3 months of take-home trial to monitor home use). At the end of each intervention, clinical outcomes and self-reported outcomes were collected to compare with their baseline performance. A generalized linear model ANOVA was used to compare the performance of each intervention with respect to their own baseline.

resultsStatistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were observed in gait performance, safety, and participant-reported measures when using the MPK C-Leg + 1M10 foot. Most participants were able to achieve higher clinical scores in gait speed, balance, self-reported mobility, and fall safety, while using the MPK + 1M10 combination. The improvement in scores were within range of scores achieved by individuals with K3 functional level as reported in previous studies.

conclusionsIndividuals with transfemoral amputation from dysvascular conditions designated MFCL level K2 benefited from using an MPK + appropriate foot. The inference and evidence from this longitudinal clinical trial will add to the knowledgebase related to reimbursement policy-making. Trial registration This study is registered on clinical trials.gov with the study title "Functional outcomes in dysvascular transfemoral amputees" and the associated ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01537211. The trial was retroactively registered on February 7, 2012 after the first participant was enrolled.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsKnee JointMicrocomputersAgedAmputation, SurgicalAmputeesCross-Over StudiesFemaleGaitHumansLegLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesWalkingC-LegDysvascularMechanical and microprocessor prosthetic kneeMedicare functional classification levelTransfemoral amputations

Identifiers

PMID34034753
PMCPMC8146219
OpenAlexW3165508794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.