Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34034530›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2021

Biomechanical demands of percussive techniques in the context of early stone toolmaking.

R Macchi, G Daver, M Brenet, S Prat, L Hugheville, S Harmand, J Lewis, M Domalain

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R MacchiInstitut PPrime, CNRS - Université de Poitiers - ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers, France.
G DaverPALEVOPRIM, CNRS - Université de Poitiers, UMR 7262, Poitiers, France.
M BrenetCNRS, UMR5199 PACEA et INRAP GSO, Université de Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France.
S PratUMR 7194 (HNHP), MNHN/CNRS/UPVD, Alliance Sorbonne Université, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France.
L HughevilleInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moëlle épinière, Paris, France.
S HarmandTurkana Basin Institute, Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
J LewisTurkana Basin Institute, Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
M DomalainInstitut PPrime, CNRS - Université de Poitiers - ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent discoveries in archaeology and palaeoanthropology highlight that stone tool knapping could have emerged first within the genera

Indexed as

HominidaeAnimalsArchaeologyBiological EvolutionBiomechanical PhenomenaTechnologyelectromyographyhomininskinematicsLomekwianmotor controlstone toolmaking

Identifiers

PMID34034530
PMCPMC8150015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.