Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34033697›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

A scoping review-Missed nursing care in community healthcare contexts and how it is measured.

Ingrid Andersson, Carina Bååth, Jan Nilsson, Anna Josse Eklund

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ingrid AnderssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3166-8949
Carina BååthDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Jan NilssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Anna Josse EklundDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science, and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1192-9697
Karlstad University · SEØstfold University College · NOUniversity of Inland Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the extent and nature of missed nursing care in elderly care in community healthcare contexts from the perspective of healthcare staff, and to identify instruments used to measure missed nursing care and the content of these instruments.

designScoping review.

methodsSearches were conducted in the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases in March 2020. The selection process followed the PRISMA flow diagram.

resultsSixteen research papers were found from nine countries. The instruments used in the studies were Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care for nursing homes (BERNCA-NH), modified MISSCARE survey and study-specific instruments or items. The item content differed, as did the number of items, which was between one and 44. The studies reported values for missed nursing care, as well as described reasons for and/or the relation between missed nursing care and organization, working climate and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Nursing CareAgedCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHumansNursing HomesSurveys and Questionnairescommunity health careelderly careinstrumentmissed nursing carescoping review

Identifiers

PMID34033697
PMCPMC9190696
OpenAlexW3165171810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.