Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34033648›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia.

Miguel Alejandro Pinzón, Santiago Ortiz, Héctor Holguín, Juan Felipe Betancur, Doris Cardona Arango, Henry Laniado, Carolina Arias Arias, Bernardo Muñoz, Julián Quiceno, Daniel Jaramillo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring pharmacological strategies in the management of ARDS: Efficacy, limitations, and future directions.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Review
  20. Observational

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Alejandro PinzónDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5840-9341
Santiago OrtizDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Héctor HolguínPharmaceutical Service, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Juan Felipe BetancurDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Doris Cardona ArangoDepartment of Public Health, CES University, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Henry LaniadoDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Universidad EAFIT, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Carolina Arias AriasDepartment of Epidemiology, CES University, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Bernardo MuñozDepartment of Pulmonology, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Julián QuicenoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Daniel JaramilloDepartment of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, CES University, Clínica León XIII, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Zoraida RamirezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clínica Medellín, Grupo Quirónsalud, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Universidad CES · COUniversidad EAFIT · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no effective therapy for the severe acute respiratory syndrome by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) responsible for the Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). To date, dexamethasone has shown a decrease in mortality in patients who require oxygen, especially those with invasive mechanical ventilation. However, it is unknown if another corticosteroid can be used, the optimal dose and its duration, to achieve a better clinical outcome. The objective of the study was to compare the differences in clinical outcome and laboratory results in hospitalized patients with severe SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia treated with dexamethasone at 6 mg doses versus patients treated with high-dose methylprednisolone. MATERIALS AND

methodsAmbispective cohort study with survival analysis of 216 patients diagnosed with severe Covid-19 pneumonia confirmed by polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV2 by Berlin protocol, who were hospitalized in a high-complexity clinic in Medellín, Colombia. The patients should also have supplementary oxygen and radiological confirmation of Pneumonia by chest tomography. Sample size was not calculated since the total population that met the inclusion criteria was evaluated. 111 patients were treated with the institutional protocol with intravenous dexamethasone 6 mg QD for seven to 10 days if they required oxygen. Since September 15, 2020, the hospitalization protocol of the clinic was modified by the Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology service, recommending a high dose of methylprednisolone of 250 to 500 mg every day for three days with a subsequent change to oral prednisone 50 mg every day for 14 days. The protocol was not applied in the intensive care unit, where dexamethasone continued to be administered. The clinical outcome and differences in laboratory results of the patients who received dexamethasone vs. the prospective cohort that received methylprednisolone from September 15 to October 31, 2020, were evaluated. Follow-up was carried out by outpatient consultation one month after discharge or by telephone, inquiring about readmission or living-dead status.

results216 patients had Covid-19 pneumonia documented by ground-glass imaging and alveolar pressure / inspired oxygen fraction (PaFi) less than 300. 111 patients received dexamethasone (DXM) and 105 received methylprednisolone (MTP). Patients in the DXM group evolved to severe ARDS in a higher proportion (26.1% vs 17.1% than the MTP group). Upon completion 4 days of treatment with parenteral corticosteroid, laboratory markers of severity decreased significantly in the group that received MTP, CRP 2.85 (2.3-3.8) vs 7.2 (5.4-9.8), (p-value < 0.0001), D-dimer 691 (612-847) vs 1083 (740-1565) (p-value = 0.04) and DHL 273 (244-289) vs 355 (270.6-422) (p-value = 0.01). After starting the corticosteroid, transfer to the intensive care unit (4.8% vs. 14.4%) and mortality (9,5% vs. 17.1%) was lower in the group that received MTP. Recovery time was shorter in patients treated with MTP, three days (3-4) vs. DXM 6 days (5-8) (p-value < 0.0001). At 30-day follow-up, 88 (92.6%) were alive in MTP vs 58 (63.1%) of those who received dexamethasone.

conclusionsIn this study, the treatment of severe Covid-19 Pneumonia with high-dose methylprednisolone for three days followed by oral prednisone for 14 days, compared with 6 mg dexamethasone for 7 to 10 days, statistically significantly decreased the recovery time, the need for transfer to intensive care and the severity markers C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer and LDH. Randomized controlled studies with methylprednisolone are required to corroborate its effect, and studies in a population hospitalized in intensive care wards.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultCOVID-19C-Reactive ProteinDexamethasoneDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMethylprednisoloneMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexC-Reactive ProteinDexamethasoneFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment DGlucocorticoidsMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID34033648
PMCPMC8148307
OpenAlexW3165150342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.