Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34033123›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2021

Recurrence, postponing pregnancy, and termination rates after hyperemesis gravidarum: Follow up of the MOTHER study.

Kelly Nijsten, Caitlin Dean, Loïs M van der Minnen, Joke M J Bais, Carrie Ris-Stalpers, Rik van Eekelen, Henk A Bremer, David P van der Ham, Wieteke M Heidema, Anjoke Huisjes and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The impact and management of hyperemesis gravidarum: Current and future perspectives.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Proximate and ultimate causes of pregnancy sickness.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025
    Review
  6. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Risk of Recurrence in Subsequent Pregnancies.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.

Kelly NijstenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-5293
Caitlin DeanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Loïs M van der MinnenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joke M J BaisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Carrie Ris-StalpersLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rik van EekelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk A BremerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands.
David P van der HamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wieteke M HeidemaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-0885
Anjoke HuisjesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Gunilla KleiverdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands.
Simone M KuppensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Judith O E H van LaarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Josje LangenveldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Flip van der MadeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dimitri PapatsonisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Marie-José PelinckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, the Netherlands.
Paula J PernetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
Leonie van Rheenen-FlachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robbert J RijndersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Hubertina C J ScheepersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Tatjana VogelvangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-550X
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marjette H KootDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Iris J GrootenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLGelre Hospitals · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLDe Kinderkliniek · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLMonash University · AUNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLOLVG · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLTreant Zorggroep · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

Amsterdam Reproduction and Development (AR&D) research institute, Amsterdam UMCAmsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute 23346North West Hospital Group 2013T085North West Hospital Group Alkmaar, the Netherlands 2013T085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHyperemesis gravidarum (HG) complicates 1% of pregnancies and has a major impact on maternal quality of life and well-being. We know very little about HG's long-term impact after an affected pregnancy, including recurrence rates in future pregnancies, which is essential information for women considering subsequent pregnancies. In this study, we aimed to prospectively measure the recurrence rate of HG and the number of postponed and terminated subsequent pregnancies due to HG. We also aimed to evaluate if there were predictive factors that could identify women at increased risk for HG recurrence, and postponing and terminating subsequent pregnancies. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study. A total of 215 women admitted for HG to public hospitals in the Netherlands were enrolled in the original MOTHER randomized controlled trial and associated observational cohort. Seventy-three women were included in this follow-up study. Data were collected through an online questionnaire. Recurrent HG was defined as vomiting symptoms accompanied by any of the following: multiple medication use, weight loss, admission, tube feeding or if nausea and vomiting symptoms were severe enough to affect life and/or work. Outcome measures were recurrence, postponing, and termination rates due to HG. Univariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictive factors associated with HG recurrence, and postponing and terminating subsequent pregnancies.

resultsThirty-five women (48%) became pregnant again of whom 40% had postponed their pregnancy due to HG. HG recurred in 89% of pregnancies. One woman terminated and eight women (23%) considered terminating their pregnancy because of recurrent HG. Twenty-four out of 38 women did not get pregnant again because of HG in the past. Univariable logistic regression analysis identifying possible predictive factors found that having a western background was associated with having weight loss due to recurrent HG in subsequent pregnancies (odds ratio 12.9, 95% CI 1.3-130.5, p = 0.03).

conclusionsHigh rates of HG recurrence and a high number of postponed pregnancies due to HG were observed. Women can be informed of a high chance of recurrence to enable informed family planning.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAbortion, LegalAdultBirth IntervalsCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansHyperemesis GravidarumNetherlandsPregnancyProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurveys and Questionnaireshyperemesis gravidaruminduced abortionpregnancy outcomerecurrencereproductive behaviorrisk assessmentrisk factorssecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID34033123
PMCPMC8457209
OpenAlexW3165805158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.