Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34032998›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Polypharmacy and medication use by cancer history in a nationally representative group of adults in the USA, 2003-2014.

Christine D Hsu, Hazel B Nichols, Jennifer L Lund

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Polypharmacy Drift after Cancer: When Survivorship Becomes a Repeat Prescription.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Emotional barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Christine D HsuDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. cdhsu@live.unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8200-5133
Hazel B NicholsDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer L LundDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study examines polypharmacy and prescription drug use patterns in cancer survivors, a growing population at risk for cancer sequelae and side effects from treatment, which can arise months or even years following diagnosis. Survivors may experience greater medication burden than the general population, increasing concerns for polypharmacy and subsequent risks of drug interactions and non-adherence.

methodsUsing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2003 to 2014, we examined the association between a cancer history and presence of polypharmacy (5+ medications). We estimated prevalence ratios and prevalence differences for polypharmacy comparing those with and without a cancer history using binomial regression models and propensity score (PS) weighting to account for baseline differences between groups.

resultsWe identified 32,238 adults aged 20 years or older; 1899 had cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin) at least 1 year before the survey. Overall, polypharmacy prevalence was 13% and 35% in those with and without a cancer history, respectively. After PS weighting, the polypharmacy prevalence was 1.26 times higher among those with versus without a cancer history (weighted prevalence ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.18, 1.35). In sub-group analyses, the weighted prevalence ratio was largest for those 20-39 years old at survey (2.78; 95% CI, 1.71, 4.53), and the weighted prevalence difference was largest for those 40-64 years old at survey (9.35%; 95% CI, 5.70%, 13.01%). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors of all ages take more medications than those without cancer history and may benefit from discussions with providers about age-tailored medication use management.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPolypharmacyPrevalenceYoung AdultCancerMedication useNHANESPolypharmacySurvivorshipYoung adults and adolescents

Identifiers

PMID34032998
PMCPMC12826348
OpenAlexW3165131919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.