ArticleLung2021
On Chronic Cough Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.
Article in Lung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the impact of the placebo response in clinical trials for chronic cough.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient satisfaction with the management of refractory and unexplained chronic cough in Canada: Results from a national survey.PloS one · 2024Article
- New Insights Into Refractory Chronic Cough and Unexplained Chronic Cough: A 6-Year Ambispective Cohort Study.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2023Article
- Chronic cough-the limitation and advances in assessment techniques.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- LUNG Year in Review: 2021.Lung · 2022Article
- Different clinical symptom patterns in patients with reflux micro-aspiration.ERJ open research · 2022Article
- Chronic cough: new insights and future prospects.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021Review
- Objective cough frequency monitoring in real-world practice.ERJ open research · 2021Article
- Antitussive efficacy of the current treatment protocol for refractory chronic cough: our real-world experience in a retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34032926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.