ArticleJAMA network open2021
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Using Administrative Health Data to Predict Onset of Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction models for progression from prediabetes to diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive value of machine learning for the progression of gestational diabetes mellitus to type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive 33-year bibliometric and literature analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Digital management of diabetes global research trends: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Developing and validating machine learning algorithms to predict various indices of diet quality among a socio-economically disadvantaged group.The British journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- An interpretable progressive residual network for automated multiclass diabetes diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pathophysiological Risk Factors Preceding Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Subtypes: A Pooled Cohort Study in the United States.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- A neuroimaging functional connectivity signature of emotional conflict monitoring predicting cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Application of generalized linear mixed effects random forest for identifying risk factors of prediabetes in Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning identifies clusters of multimorbidity among decedents with inflammatory bowel disease.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Principles and Practices of Community Engagement in AI for Population Health: Formative Qualitative Study of the AI for Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Project.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Neurochemical Aspects of the Role of Thirst in Body Fluid Homeostasis and Their Significance in Health and Disease: A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Development and evaluation of a machine learning model for osteoporosis risk prediction in Korean women.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Identifying nexilin as a central gene in neutrophil-driven abdominal aortic aneurysm pathogenesis.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Prediction model for type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with mortality using machine learning in three independent cohorts from South Korea, Japan, and the UK: a model development and validation study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Harnessing gut-derived bioactives and AI diagnostics for the next generation of type 2 diabetes solutions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Performance evaluation and comparative analysis of different machine learning algorithms in predicting postnatal care utilization: Evidence from the ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Bias in machine learning applications to address non-communicable diseases at a population-level: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Systems-level barriers to diabetes care could be improved with population health planning tools that accurately discriminate between high- and low-risk groups to guide investments and targeted interventions. Objective: To develop and validate a population-level machine learning model for predicting type 2 diabetes 5 years before diabetes onset using administrative health data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This decision analytical model study used linked administrative health data from the diverse, single-payer health system in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016. A gradient boosting decision tree model was trained on data from 1 657 395 patients, validated on 243 442 patients, and tested on 236 506 patients. Costs associated with each patient were estimated using a validated costing algorithm. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. Exposures: A random sample of 2 137 343 residents of Ontario without type 2 diabetes was obtained at study start time. More than 300 features from data sets capturing demographic information, laboratory measurements, drug benefits, health care system interactions, social determinants of health, and ambulatory care and hospitalization records were compiled over 2-year patient medical histories to generate quarterly predictions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistic, and calibration was assessed visually using calibration plots. Feature contribution was assessed with Shapley values. Costs were estimated in 2020 US dollars. Results: This study trained a gradient boosting decision tree model on data from 1 657 395 patients (12 900 257 instances; 6 666 662 women [51.7%]). The developed model achieved a test area under the curve of 80.26 (range, 80.21-80.29), demonstrated good calibration, and was robust to sex, immigration status, area-level marginalization with regard to material deprivation and race/ethnicity, and low contact with the health care system. The top 5% of patients predicted as high risk by the model represented 26% of the total annual diabetes cost in Ontario. Conclusions and Relevance: In this decision analytical model study, a machine learning model approach accurately predicted the incidence of diabetes in the population using routinely collected health administrative data. These results suggest that the model could be used to inform decision-making for population health planning and diabetes prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.