Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34032829›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2021

Effect of Continuous Infusion of Hypertonic Saline vs Standard Care on 6-Month Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: The COBI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Antoine Roquilly, Jean Denis Moyer, Olivier Huet, Sigismond Lasocki, Benjamin Cohen, Claire Dahyot-Fizelier, Kevin Chalard, Philippe Seguin, Caroline Jeantrelle, Véronique Vermeersch and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03143751 phase3completednot on this map

Continuous Hyperosomolar Therapy for Traumatic Brain-injured Patients Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Open-label Trial With Blinded Adjudication of Primary Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled370ConditionsModerate to Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryArmsNaCl20% (Continuous hyperosmolar therapy)
NCT06429657 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ketamine for Sedation in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsSevere Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Hypertension, Intracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveArmsKetamine with propofol, Standard of Care propofol, fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, morphine, hydromorphone, midazolam, or lorazepam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of Concomitant Traumatic Brain Injuries on the Surgical Treatment of Burns: A Long-Term, Monocentric Retrospective Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine RoquillyUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Jean Denis MoyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Paris, France.
Olivier HuetCHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France.
Sigismond LasockiCHU d'Angers, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Angers, France.
Benjamin CohenCHU de Tours, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Tours, France.
Claire Dahyot-FizelierCHU de Potiers, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Poitiers, France.
Kevin ChalardCHU de Montpellier, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Montpellier, France.
Philippe SeguinCHU de Rennes, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Rennes, France.
Caroline JeantrelleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Paris, France.
Véronique VermeerschCHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France.
Thomas GaillardCHU d'Angers, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Angers, France.
Raphael CinottiUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Dominique Demeure Dit LatteUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Pierre Joachim MaheUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Mickael Vourc'hUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Florian Pierre MartinUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Alice ChopinUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Celine LerebourgUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Laurent FletCHU de Nantes, Service de pharmacie, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Anne ChiffoleauDRCI, Departement promotion, cellule vigilances, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Fanny FeuilletDRCI, Plateforme de Méthodologie et de Biostatistique, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Karim AsehnouneUniversité de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Pôle anesthésie réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
Atlanrea Study Group and the Société Française d’Anesthésie Réanimation (SFAR) Research Network
Société Française d'Allergologie · FRNantes Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Fluid therapy is an important component of care for patients with traumatic brain injury, but whether it modulates clinical outcomes remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether continuous infusion of hypertonic saline solution improves neurological outcome at 6 months in patients with traumatic brain injury. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in 9 intensive care units in France, including 370 patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury who were recruited from October 2017 to August 2019. Follow-up was completed in February 2020. Interventions: Adult patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury were randomly assigned to receive continuous infusion of 20% hypertonic saline solution plus standard care (n = 185) or standard care alone (controls; n = 185). The 20% hypertonic saline solution was administered for 48 hours or longer if patients remained at risk of intracranial hypertension. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) score (range, 1-8, with lower scores indicating worse functional outcome) at 6 months, obtained centrally by blinded assessors and analyzed with ordinal logistic regression adjusted for prespecified prognostic factors (with a common odds ratio [OR] >1.0 favoring intervention). There were 12 secondary outcomes measured at multiple time points, including development of intracranial hypertension and 6-month mortality. Results: Among 370 patients who were randomized (median age, 44 [interquartile range, 27-59] years; 77 [20.2%] women), 359 (97%) completed the trial. The adjusted common OR for the GOS-E score at 6 months was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.71-1.47; P = .92). Of the 12 secondary outcomes, 10 were not significantly different. Intracranial hypertension developed in 62 (33.7%) patients in the intervention group and 66 (36.3%) patients in the control group (absolute difference, -2.6% [95% CI, -12.3% to 7.2%]; OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.51-1.26]). There was no significant difference in 6-month mortality (29 [15.9%] in the intervention group vs 37 [20.8%] in the control group; absolute difference, -4.9% [95% CI, -12.8% to 3.1%]; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.28]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, treatment with continuous infusion of 20% hypertonic saline compared with standard care did not result in a significantly better neurological status at 6 months. However, confidence intervals for the findings were wide, and the study may have had limited power to detect a clinically important difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03143751.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansHypernatremiaHypnotics and SedativesInfusions, IntravenousIntracranial HypertensionKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedSaline Solution, HypertonicHypnotics and SedativesSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID34032829
PMCPMC8150692
OpenAlexW3165236740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.