Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34032581›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Leveraging Genetic Reports and Electronic Health Records for the Prediction of Primary Cancers: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.

Nansu Zong, Victoria Ngo, Daniel J Stone, Andrew Wen, Yiqing Zhao, Yue Yu, Sijia Liu, Ming Huang, Chen Wang, Guoqian Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nansu ZongDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0066-9524
Victoria NgoUniversity of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-8379
Daniel J StoneDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-0712
Andrew WenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-8028
Yiqing ZhaoDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2874-8136
Yue YuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-1217
Sijia LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-1164
Ming HuangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-3626
Chen WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2638-3081
Guoqian JiangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-0019
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Tools for standardizing clinical research metadata using HL7 FHIRU01HG009450 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsR00GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2021 to 2023
$747k
FHIRCat: Enabling the Semantics of FHIR and Terminologies for Clinical and Translational ResearchR56EB028101 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2019 to 2019
$601k
BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsK99GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2020 to 2021
$108k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009450NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB028101NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM135488NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision oncology has the potential to leverage clinical and genomic data in advancing disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. A key research area focuses on the early detection of primary cancers and potential prediction of cancers of unknown primary in order to facilitate optimal treatment decisions.

objectiveThis study presents a methodology to harmonize phenotypic and genetic data features to classify primary cancer types and predict cancers of unknown primaries.

methodsWe extracted genetic data elements from oncology genetic reports of 1011 patients with cancer and their corresponding phenotypical data from Mayo Clinic's electronic health records. We modeled both genetic and electronic health record data with HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources. The semantic web Resource Description Framework was employed to generate the network-based data representation (ie, patient-phenotypic-genetic network). Based on the Resource Description Framework data graph, Node2vec graph-embedding algorithm was applied to generate features. Multiple machine learning and deep learning backbone models were compared for cancer prediction performance.

resultsWith 6 machine learning tasks designed in the experiment, we demonstrated the proposed method achieved favorable results in classifying primary cancer types (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 96.56% for all 9 cancer predictions on average based on the cross-validation) and predicting unknown primaries (AUROC 80.77% for all 8 cancer predictions on average for real-patient validation). To demonstrate the interpretability, 17 phenotypic and genetic features that contributed the most to the prediction of each cancer were identified and validated based on a literature review.

conclusionsAccurate prediction of cancer types can be achieved with existing electronic health record data with satisfactory precision. The integration of genetic reports improves prediction, illustrating the translational values of incorporating genetic tests early at the diagnosis stage for patients with cancer.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsFast Healthcare Interoperability ResourcesFHIRgenetic reportspredicting primary cancersRDFResource Description Framework

Identifiers

PMID34032581
PMCPMC8188315
OpenAlexW3121716842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.