ReviewCirculation2021
Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association.
Review in Circulation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Revisiting Some Useful Statistical Guidelines inCirculation research · 2021Guideline
- A Bayesian analysis of finerenone in heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified analysis of FINEARTS-HF.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Trial
- Vitamin D and Marine n-3 Fatty Acids for Autoimmune Disease Prevention: Outcomes Two Years After Completion of a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Trial
- Inhaled Epoprostenol Compared With Nitric Oxide for Right Ventricular Support After Major Cardiac Surgery.Circulation · 2023Trial
- Relationship between Ketones, Ghrelin, and, Appetite on Isocaloric Diets with Varying Carbohydrate Quality and Amount: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in People with Obesity (CARBFUNC).The Journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- The Effect of a Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor on Neurovascular Regulation in Humans.Circulation research · 2022Trial
- Vitamin D and marine omega 3 fatty acid supplementation and incident autoimmune disease: VITAL randomized controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- The junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high residual risk.European heart journal · 2026Observational
- Management and Prognosis of Patients With Acute Pericarditis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective, Single-Centre Study.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Beta-Blocker therapy improves survival after concomitant septal myectomy and aortic valve replacement.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted multiscale lung modeling to predict alveolar septal wall stress.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Bayesian Reanalysis of Mortality Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials: Addressing Limitations of Traditional Significance Testing.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Patient-specific modifiers of survival benefit in cardiac resynchronization therapy - A multicentre interaction analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Dissecting contributions of pulmonary arterial remodeling to right ventricular afterload in pulmonary hypertension.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Article
- Recommendations for a Complete Reporting of Statistical Methods in Veterinary Pharmacology.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Lower early mortality and risk prediction improvement of obesity after acute pulmonary embolism: results from a multicenter cohort analysis with external validation.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Abdominal fat accumulation increases the risk of high blood pressure: evidence of 47,037 participants from Chinese and US national population surveys.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- Systematic evaluation of vertebral bone quality score as an opportunistic screening method for BMD in spine surgery patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Impact of Clinical Decision Support with Mandatory versus Voluntary Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Effects of aerobic exercise training on cerebral pulsatile hemodynamics in middle-aged adults with elevated blood pressure/stage 1 hypertension.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical analyses are a crucial component of the biomedical research process and are necessary to draw inferences from biomedical research data. The application of sound statistical methodology is a prerequisite for publication in the American Heart Association (AHA) journal portfolio. The objective of this document is to summarize key aspects of statistical reporting that might be most relevant to the authors, reviewers, and readership of AHA journals. The AHA Scientific Publication Committee convened a task force to inventory existing statistical standards for publication in biomedical journals and to identify approaches suitable for the AHA journal portfolio. The experts on the task force were selected by the AHA Scientific Publication Committee, who identified 12 key topics that serve as the section headers for this document. For each topic, the members of the writing group identified relevant references and evaluated them as a resource to make the standards summarized herein. Each section was independently reviewed by an expert reviewer who was not part of the task force. Expert reviewers were also permitted to comment on other sections if they chose. Differences of opinion were adjudicated by consensus. The standards presented in this report are intended to serve as a guide for high-quality reporting of statistical analyses methods and results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.