Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031973›Full record

ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2021

Core Evidence-Based Practice Competencies and Learning Outcomes for European Nurses: Consensus Statements.

Jakub Dolezel, Renata Zelenikova, Stefano Finotto, Daniela Mecugni, Athina Patelarou, Mariusz Panczyk, Maria Ruzafa-Martínez, Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo, Brigita Skela-Savič, Joanna Gotlib and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jakub DolezelDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3335-5150
Renata ZelenikovaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-6696
Stefano FinottoUniversity of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-602X
Daniela MecugniUniversity of Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-050X
Athina PatelarouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Crete, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-0650
Mariusz PanczykDepartment of Education and Research in Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-2114
Maria Ruzafa-MartínezFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-738X
Antonio Jesús Ramos-MorcilloFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-3326
Brigita Skela-SavičAngela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-5383
Joanna GotlibDepartment of Education and Research in Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2717-7741
Evridiki PatelarouDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Crete, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-3200
Marta SmodišAngela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia.
Darja JarosovaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3032-3076

Funding

European Commission 2018-1-ES01-KA203-050216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsensus on evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies and associated learning outcomes for registered nurses has not yet been achieved in the European context.

aimsTo establish a set of core EBP competencies for nurses and the most important EBP learning outcomes encompassing attitudes, knowledge, and skills dimensions for implementation into nursing education in European countries.

methodsA multi-phase modified Delphi survey was conducted: Phase 1, a literature review; Phase 2, a two-round consensus of experts; and Phase 3, a Delphi survey. Experts from six European countries participated.

resultsIn Phase 1, 88 records were selected and 835 statements extracted, which were grouped according to the seven steps of EBP. After removing 157 duplicates, the remaining competencies (n = 678) were evaluated in Phase 2. Then, a two-round expert consensus was reached, with 24 competencies and 120 learning outcomes identified and divided into affective, cognitive, and skills domains. In Phase 3, based on a Delphi survey expert consensus, all evaluated statements were included in a final set of competencies and learning outcomes. Only two learning outcomes were recommended for allocation to a different domain, and four were reformulated as suggested, with no further changes to the others. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The set of EBP competencies and learning outcomes can guide nurse educators, managers, and EBP stakeholders in the development of content that incorporates EBP knowledge, skills, and attitudes into educational programs. Prioritizing the EBP competencies and learning outcomes that are most necessary and adapting them to every context will provide healthcare organizations with guidelines for enhancing the continuing education of nurses. These results could facilitate the development of effective tools for assessing nursing students' and nurses' perception of competencies required for EBP processes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDelphi TechniqueEuropeEvidence-Based PracticeHumansNursesSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingcompetencyconsensusDelphi surveyevidence-based practicelearninglearning outcomenursenursing education

Identifiers

PMID34031973
PMCPMC8251814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.