Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031959›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2021

Persistent soil seed banks promote naturalisation and invasiveness in flowering plants.

Margherita Gioria, Angelino Carta, Carol C Baskin, Wayne Dawson, Franz Essl, Holger Kreft, Jan Pergl, Mark van Kleunen, Patrick Weigelt, Marten Winter and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reproductive Ecology of the Invasive Alien ShrubPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Margherita GioriaInstitute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-4688
Angelino CartaDepartment of Biology, Botany Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-818X
Carol C BaskinDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-154X
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-0774
Franz EsslBioInvasions, Global Change, Macroecology-Group, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-2112
Holger KreftBiodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-8236
Jan PerglInstitute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-1974
Mark van KleunenEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3701
Patrick WeigeltBiodiversity, Macroecology and Biogeography, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-3708
Marten WinterGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research-iDiv, Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9593-7300
Petr PyšekInstitute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-442X
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany · CZUniversity of Göttingen · DECharles University · CZDurham University · GBGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Akademie Věd České Republiky RVO 67985939Austrian Science Fund I 3757-B29Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 202548816Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG FZT 118Grantová Agentura České Republiky 19-20405SGrantová Agentura České Republiky 19-28807X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With globalisation facilitating the movement of plants and seeds beyond the native range, preventing potentially harmful introductions requires knowledge of what drives the successful establishment and spread of alien plants. Here, we examined global-scale relationships between naturalisation success (incidence and extent) and invasiveness, soil seed bank properties (type and densities) and key species traits (seed mass, seed dormancy and life form) for 2350 species of angiosperms. Naturalisation and invasiveness were strongly associated with the ability to form persistent (vs. transient) seed banks but relatively weakly with seed bank densities and other traits. Our findings suggest that seed bank persistence is a trait that better captures the ability to become naturalised and invasive compared to seed traits more widely available in trait databases. Knowledge of seed persistence can contribute to our ability to predict global naturalisation and invasiveness and to identify potentially invasive flowering plants before they are introduced.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaSeed BankPlant DormancySeedsSoilSoilalien speciesangiospermdormancyexotic speciesGloNAFGloSSBankpersistenceplant invasionsseed mass

Identifiers

PMID34031959
PMCPMC8361993
OpenAlexW3164051375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.