Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031803›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Disparities in post-operative surveillance testing for metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors.

Janeth I Sanchez, Veena Shankaran, Joseph M Unger, Margaret M Madeleine, Noah Espinoza, Beti Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janeth I SanchezSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. jisanche@fredhutch.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8069-2363
Veena ShankaranPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA.
Joseph M UngerSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Margaret M MadeleinePublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98166, USA.
Noah EspinozaClinical Analytics, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Beti ThompsonSchool of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357230, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
University of Washington Health Services Research Training ProgramT32HS013853 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEINER, BRYAN J., WILLIAMS, EMILY CATERINA · 2003 to 2024
$6.9M
Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (BCPT)T32CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Margaret A Hannon · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013853NCI NIH HHS T32 CA092408NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmong colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, treatment for metastatic recurrence is most effective when malignancies are detected early through surveillance with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level test and computer tomography (CT) imaging. However, utilization of these tests is low, and many survivors fail to meet the recommended guidelines. This population-based study assesses individual- and neighborhood-level factors associated with receipt of CEA and CT surveillance testing.

methodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data to identify Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with CRC stages II-III between 2010 and 2013. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to estimate the effect of individual and neighborhood factors on receipt of CEA and CT tests within 18 months post-surgery.

resultsOverall, 78% and 58% of CRC survivors received CEA and CT testing, respectively. We found significant within racial/ethnic differences in receipt of these surveillance tests. Medicare-Medicaid dual coverage was associated with 39% lower odds of receipt of CEA tests among non-Hispanic Whites, and Blacks with dual coverage had almost two times the odds of receiving CEA tests compared to Blacks without dual coverage.

conclusionsAlthough this study did not find significant differences in receipt of initial CEA and CT surveillance testing across racial/ethnic groups, the assessment of the factors that measure access to care suggests differences in access to these procedures within racial/ethnic groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Our findings have implications for developing targeted interventions focused on promoting surveillance for the early detection of metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors and improve their health outcomes.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsAgedCarcinoembryonic AntigenHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMedicareSurvivorsUnited StatesCarcinoembryonic AntigenCancer disparitiesColorectal CancerSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34031803
PMCPMC10424733
OpenAlexW3164252845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.