Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031778›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2021

Consensual Non-Monogamy Relationship Rules Among Young Gay and Bisexual Men: A Dyadic Qualitative Analysis.

J L Stewart, Christopher B Stults, Annie Ristuccia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Relationship Inclusivity in Sexual and Gender Minority Psychology.Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity · 2024
    Article
  3. Sexual Orientation and Infidelity-Related Behaviors on Social Media Sites.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J L StewartDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7435-3146
Christopher B StultsDepartment of Psychology, Baruch College, City University of New York, Box B8-215, Lexington Ave., New York, NY, 10010, USA. christopher.stults@baruch.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0310-5732
Annie RistucciaMount Sinai Institute for Advanced Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationship rules, the boundaries and understandings partners have about acceptable behaviors related to their CNM relationship, are associated with relationship functioning and sexual health risk among gay and bisexual men. Partnered young gay and bisexual men (YGBM) experience unique relational challenges and sexual health disparities. Thus, understanding the nuances of relationship rules among YGBM in CNM relationships is of particular importance. However, few studies have examined relationship rules specifically among YGBM. The current study sought to explore relationship rules among YGBM in CNM relationships, including both those explicitly discussed and those implicitly assumed. We also assessed concordance and discrepancies in partners' reports of their relationship rules, as well as rule violations. Partners from 10 CNM couples (n = 20; M

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMenSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersConsensual non-monogamyRelationship rules and agreementsSexual orientationYoung gay and bisexual men

Identifiers

PMID34031778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.