ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021
Can methods of artificial intelligence aid in optimizing patient selection in patients undergoing intrauterine inseminations?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current state of artificial intelligence applications in assisted reproductive technology: A narrative review.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Women's Healthcare: A Systematic Review.Qatar medical journal · 2026Review
- Machine learning in predicting infertility treatment success: A systematic literature review of techniques.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Management of Male Infertility, a Scoping Review.Current urology reports · 2024Article
- Development of a machine learning-based prediction model for clinical pregnancy of intrauterine insemination in a large Chinese population.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Comparative study of machine learning approaches integrated with genetic algorithm for IVF success prediction.PloS one · 2024Article
- DTLR-CS: Deep tensor low rank channel cross fusion neural network for reproductive cell segmentation.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAI and its machine learning algorithms have proven useful in several fields of medicine, including medically assisted reproduction. The purpose of the study was to construct several predictive models based on clinical data and select the best models to predict IUI procedure outcomes.
methodsClinical data (patient baseline characteristics, sperm quality, hormonal status, and cycle data) from 1029 IUI procedures performed in 413 couples stimulated by clomiphene citrate, letrozole, or gonadotropins were used to build several models to predict clinical pregnancy. The models included ANN, random forest, PLS, SVM, and linear models using the caret package in R. The models were evaluated using ROC analysis by means of random CV on test data.
resultsOut of the best performing models, the random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.66, a sensitivity of 0.432, and a specificity of 0.756. This performance was followed by the PLS model, which achieved a sensitivity of 0.459 and specificity of 0.734. The other models achieved significantly lower AUCs. When adjusting the predictive cutoff value, confusion matrices show that clinical pregnancy is twice as likely in the case of positive prediction.
conclusionAmong the compared methods, the random forest and PLS models demonstrated superior performance in predicting the clinical outcome of IUI. With additional research and clinical validation, AI methods may be successfully used in improving patient selection and consequently lead to better clinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.