Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031765›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Can methods of artificial intelligence aid in optimizing patient selection in patients undergoing intrauterine inseminations?

Nejc Kozar, Vilma Kovač, Milan Reljič

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nejc KozarDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia. nejc@kozar.me.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-5024
Vilma KovačDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Milan ReljičDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (SI) P3-0327University Medical Centre Maribor IRP-2019/01-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAI and its machine learning algorithms have proven useful in several fields of medicine, including medically assisted reproduction. The purpose of the study was to construct several predictive models based on clinical data and select the best models to predict IUI procedure outcomes.

methodsClinical data (patient baseline characteristics, sperm quality, hormonal status, and cycle data) from 1029 IUI procedures performed in 413 couples stimulated by clomiphene citrate, letrozole, or gonadotropins were used to build several models to predict clinical pregnancy. The models included ANN, random forest, PLS, SVM, and linear models using the caret package in R. The models were evaluated using ROC analysis by means of random CV on test data.

resultsOut of the best performing models, the random forest model achieved an AUC of 0.66, a sensitivity of 0.432, and a specificity of 0.756. This performance was followed by the PLS model, which achieved a sensitivity of 0.459 and specificity of 0.734. The other models achieved significantly lower AUCs. When adjusting the predictive cutoff value, confusion matrices show that clinical pregnancy is twice as likely in the case of positive prediction.

conclusionAmong the compared methods, the random forest and PLS models demonstrated superior performance in predicting the clinical outcome of IUI. With additional research and clinical validation, AI methods may be successfully used in improving patient selection and consequently lead to better clinical results.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePatient SelectionAdultClomipheneDecision Making, Computer-AssistedFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleGonadotropinsHumansInsemination, ArtificialLetrozoleMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancySpermatozoaSupport Vector MachineClomipheneFertility Agents, FemaleGonadotropinsLetrozoleArtificial intelligenceIntrauterine inseminationNeural networkPartial least squaresRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID34031765
PMCPMC8324709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.