ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Low insertion of cystic duct increases risk for common bile duct stone recurrence.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Clip migration induced recurrent choledocholithiasis after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomical Trickery in Acute Cholecystitis: Very Low Cystic Duct Insertion Near the Ampulla of Vater.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effect of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy on choledocholithiasis and its clinical significance.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Recurrence of common bile duct stones after endoscopic clearance and its predictors: A systematic review.DEN open · 2024Review
- New common bile duct morphological subtypes: Risk predictors of common bile duct stone recurrence.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommon bile duct (CBD) stone is one of the most frequent biliary diseases. Recurrence after the complete removal of CBD stones is high, and we aim to evaluate the rate and risk factors for symptomatic recurrence of CBD stones after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
methodsWe, retrospectively, reviewed the database of patients who underwent ERCP for CBD stones and subsequent cholecystectomy between January 2015 and December 2017 at a tertiary hospital. The recurrence of symptomatic CBD stones was defined as the presence of a CBD stone with related symptoms at least 6 months after the ERCP procedure. The primary outcomes were recurrence of symptomatic CBD stones and its risk factors.
resultsAmong the 362 enrolled patients, 60 experienced a symptomatic recurrence of CBD stones between 6 months and 5 years after the procedure. The mean duration of follow-up was 32.3 ± 8.1 months. The patients with recurrences were older and had a longer follow-up duration. Low insertion of the cystic duct (HR = 2.893, p = 0.016), distal CBD angulation (HR = 1.015, p = 0.034), maximum CBD diameter (HR = 1.070, p = 0.012), number of ERCP sessions at first admission (HR = 1.558, p = 0.032), and cannulation time (HR = 1.030, p = 0.008) were the independent risk factors for symptomatic recurrent CBD stones.
conclusionsPatients with risk factors, especially those with low cystic duct insertion, are more prone to symptomatic recurrent CBD stones and should be followed more carefully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.