Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031739›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.

John O Barron, Danny Orabi, Amika Moro, Cristiano Quintini, Eren Berber, Federico N Aucejo, Kazunari Sasaki, Choon-Hyuck D Kwon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John O BarronCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Danny OrabiCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Amika MoroCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cristiano QuintiniCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Eren BerberCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Federico N AucejoCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Kazunari SasakiCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. sasakik@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2514-5778
Choon-Hyuck D KwonCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) involves a difficult learning curve, for which multiple difficulty scores have been proposed to assist with safe adaptation. The IWATE Criteria is a 4-level difficulty score shown to correlate with conversion to open surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and operative time in Japanese and French cohorts. We set out to validate the IWATE Criteria in a North American cohort, describe the evolution of our LLR program, and analyze the IWATE Criteria's ability to predict conversion to open surgery.

methodsPatients that underwent LLR between January 2006 and December 2019 were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Difficulty outcomes, including conversion to open surgery, EBL, operative time, and post-operative complications were analyzed according to IWATE difficulty level, both overall and between chronological eras. The IWATE Criteria's ability to predict conversion to open surgery was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsA total of 426 patients met inclusion criteria. Operative time, EBL, and conversion to open surgery increased in concordance with low to advanced IWATE difficulty. ROC analysis for conversion to open surgery demonstrated an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.694. Predictive performance was superior during the first two eras, with AUCs of 0.771 and 0.775; predictive value decreased as the LLR program gained experience, with AUCs of 0.708 and 0.551 for eras three and four.

conclusionsThis study validated the IWATE Criteria in a North American population distinct from previous Japanese and French cohorts, based on its correlation with operative time, EBL, and conversion to open surgery. The IWATE Criteria may be of utility for identification of LLR cases appropriate for surgeon experience, as well as determination of laparoscopic feasibility. Interval difficulty score recalibration may be warranted as surgeon perception of difficulty evolves.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLength of StayNorth AmericaOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesDifficulty scoreIWATE criteriaLaparoscopic hepatectomyLaparoscopic liver resectionNorth AmericaValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.