Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Novel assessment of the variation in cervical inter-vertebral motor control in a healthy pain-free population.

René Lindstrøm, Alexander Breen, Ning Qu, Alister du Rose, Victoria Blogg Andersen, Alan Breen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anti-directional segmental motion during flexion and extension in the adolescent thoracolumbar spine: a normative study of 166 participants.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

René LindstrømDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Alexander BreenCentre for Biomechanics Research, AECC University College, Parkwood Rd, Bournemouth, UK.
Ning QuDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Alister du RoseCentre for Biomechanics Research, AECC University College, Parkwood Rd, Bournemouth, UK.
Victoria Blogg AndersenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Alan BreenFaculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, UK. abreen4@bournemouth.ac.uk.
Aalborg University · DKHealth Sciences University · GBBournemouth University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal control at intervertebral levels is dependent on interactions between the active, passive and neural control elements. However, this has never been quantifiable, and has therefore been outside the reach of clinical assessments and research. This study used fluoroscopy during repeated unconstrained flexion and return neck movements to calculate intersegmental motor control (MC), defined as the difference and variation in repeated continuous angular motion from its average path. The study aimed to determine control values for MC at individual levels and its variability. Twenty male volunteers aged 19-29 received fluoroscopic screening of their cervical spines during 4 repetitions of neutral to full flexion and return motion. Moving vertebral images from C0-C1 to C6-C7 were tracked using cross-correlation codes written in Matlab. MC for each level was defined as the mean of the absolute differences between each repetition's angular path and their mean and its variability as represented by the SD. 1-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons were used to identify significant contrasts between levels. The mean MC differences and SDs were highest at C1-2, suggesting that this level has the least control and the most variability. Results at this level alone were highly significant (F-ratio 10.88 and 9.79 P < 0.0001). Significant contrasts were only found between C1-C2 and all other levels. The mean MC difference for summed C1-6 levels was 3.4° (0.7-6.1). This study is the first to quantify intervertebral MC in the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Studies of neck pain patients are now merited.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCervical VertebraeFluoroscopyHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRange of Motion, ArticularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34031512
PMCPMC8144187
OpenAlexW3164592064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.