ArticleScientific reports2021
Estimating the impact of control measures to prevent outbreaks of COVID-19 associated with air travel into a COVID-19-free country.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- COVID-19 passenger screening to reduce travel risk and translocation of disease.Epidemiology and infection · 2024Article
- Seroprevalence and factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers: cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Assessing the efficacy of health countermeasures on arrival time of infectious diseases.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023Article
- Poor air passenger knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and behaviour undermines strategies aimed at preventing the import of SARS-CoV-2 into the UK.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The impact of multiple non-pharmaceutical interventions for China-bound travel on domestic COVID-19 outbreaks.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The impact of air travel on the precocity and severity of COVID-19 deaths in sub-national areas across 45 countries.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Decade-low aerosol levels over the Bohai and Yellow Seas amid the COVID-19 lockdown.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2022Article
- Exploring the co-movements between COVID-19 pandemic and international air traffic: A global perspective based on wavelet analysis.International migration (Geneva, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Potential of Microneedle Systems for COVID-19 Vaccination: Current Trends and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Evaluating the effectiveness of Hong Kong's border restriction policy in reducing COVID-19 infections.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Simulating Transmission Scenarios of the Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- International air travel-related control measures to contain the Covid-19 pandemic: A companion review to a Cochrane rapid review.New microbes and new infectionsReview
- Is border closure effective in containing COVID-19?Travel medicine and infectious diseaseArticle
- Modeling approaches to inform travel-related policies for COVID-19 containment: A scoping review and future directions.Travel medicine and infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks associated with air travel to a COVID-19-free country [New Zealand (NZ)]. A stochastic version of the SEIR model CovidSIM v1.1, designed specifically for COVID-19 was utilised. We first considered historical data for Australia before it eliminated COVID-19 (equivalent to an outbreak generating 74 new cases/day) and one flight per day to NZ with no interventions in place. This gave a median time to an outbreak of 0.2 years (95% range of simulation results: 3 days to 1.1 years) or a mean of 110 flights per outbreak. However, the combined use of a pre-flight PCR test of saliva, three subsequent PCR tests (on days 1, 3 and 12 in NZ), and various other interventions (mask use and contact tracing) reduced this risk to one outbreak after a median of 1.5 years (20 days to 8.1 years). A pre-flight test plus 14 days quarantine was an even more effective strategy (4.9 years; 2,594 flights). For a much lower prevalence (representing only two new community cases per week in the whole of Australia), the annual risk of an outbreak with no interventions was 1.2% and had a median time to an outbreak of 56 years. In contrast the risks associated with travellers from Japan and the United States was very much higher and would need quarantine or other restrictions. Collectively, these results suggest that multi-layered interventions can markedly reduce the risk of importing the pandemic virus via air travel into a COVID-19-free nation. For some low-risk source countries, there is the potential to replace 14-day quarantine with alternative interventions. However, all approaches require public and policy deliberation about acceptable risks, and continuous careful management and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.