Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Predicting MHC I restricted T cell epitopes in mice with NAP-CNB, a novel online tool.

Carlos Wert-Carvajal, Rubén Sánchez-García, José R Macías, Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona, Almudena Méndez Pérez, Ramon Alemany, Esteban Veiga, Carlos Óscar S Sorzano, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Computational Methods for Cancer Neoantigen Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Targeting PP2A for cancer therapeutic modulation.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos Wert-Carvajal *Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Sánchez-García *Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
José R MacíasCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Rebeca Sanz-PamplonaUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Oncology Data Analytics Program (ODAP), Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Almudena Méndez PérezCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Ramon AlemanyProcure Program, Institut Català d'Oncologia- Oncobell Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Esteban VeigaCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Óscar S SorzanoCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Arrate Muñoz-BarrutiaDepartamento de Bioingenieria e Ingenieria Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911, Leganés, Spain. mamunozb@ing.uc3m.es.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of a dedicated integrated pipeline for neoantigen discovery in mice hinders cancer immunotherapy research. Novel sequential approaches through recurrent neural networks can improve the accuracy of T-cell epitope binding affinity predictions in mice, and a simplified variant selection process can reduce operational requirements. We have developed a web server tool (NAP-CNB) for a full and automatic pipeline based on recurrent neural networks, to predict putative neoantigens from tumoral RNA sequencing reads. The developed software can estimate H-2 peptide ligands, with an AUC comparable or superior to state-of-the-art methods, directly from tumor samples. As a proof-of-concept, we used the B16 melanoma model to test the system's predictive capabilities, and we report its putative neoantigens. NAP-CNB web server is freely available at http://biocomp.cnb.csic.es/NeoantigensApp/ with scripts and datasets accessible through the download section.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmComputational BiologyEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class I

Identifiers

PMID34031450
PMCPMC8144223
OpenAlexW3164587698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.