Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031245›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation.

Jennifer L Raynor, Corbett A Grainger, Dominic P Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A global assessment of large terrestrial carnivore kill rates.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reintroduction of Captive Tigers: Challenges & Concerns.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer L RaynorDepartment of Economics, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459; jlraynor@wesleyan.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0229-9889
Corbett A GraingerDepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0001-5789-3725
Dominic P ParkerDepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies uncover cascading ecological effects resulting from removing and reintroducing predators into a landscape, but little is known about effects on human lives and property. We quantify the effects of restoring wolf populations by evaluating their influence on deer-vehicle collisions (DVCs) in Wisconsin. We show that, for the average county, wolf entry reduced DVCs by 24%, yielding an economic benefit that is 63 times greater than the costs of verified wolf predation on livestock. Most of the reduction is due to a behavioral response of deer to wolves rather than through a deer population decline from wolf predation. This finding supports ecological research emphasizing the role of predators in creating a "landscape of fear." It suggests wolves control economic damages from overabundant deer in ways that human deer hunters cannot.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPredatory BehaviorSafetyTransportationAnimalsDeerEcosystemPopulation DensityUnited StatesWolvesdeer–vehicle collisioneconomic impactgray wolf (Canis lupus)trophic cascadewhite-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Identifiers

PMID34031245
PMCPMC8179214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.