Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031116›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Proposal of MUAC as a fast tool to monitor pregnancy nutritional status: results from a cohort study in Brazil.

Maria J Miele, Renato T Souza, Imp Calderon, Francisco Feitosa, Debora F Leite, Edilberto Rocha Filho, Janete Vettorazzi, Jussara Mayrink, Karayna G Fernandes, Matias C Vieira and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A Cross-sectional Study to Determine the Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women using Mid-upper Arm Circumference and Neck Circumference.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria J MieleObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Renato T SouzaObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Imp CalderonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UNESP Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu, Brazil.
Francisco FeitosaObstetric Department of MEAC, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Debora F LeiteObstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Edilberto Rocha FilhoObstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Janete VettorazziObstetrics and Gynecology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jussara MayrinkObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Karayna G FernandesObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Matias C VieiraDivision of Women's Health, King's College London School of Life Course Sciences, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-4275
Rodolfo C PacagnellaObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Jose Guilherme CecattiObstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil cecatti@unicamp.br.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-8445
Preterm SAMBA study group
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRKing's College London · GBUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn Brazil, although the assessment of maternal nutritional status is recommended using body mass index (BMI), this is only possible in settings adequately prepared. Midupper arm circumference (MUAC) is another biological variable identified as a tool for rapid assessment of nutritional status that is correlated with BMI. Therefore, we aim to surrogate BMI by MUAC cut-offs for rapid screening of maternal nutritional status starting at midpregnancy.

designAnalysis of the multicentre cohort study entitled 'Preterm SAMBA' using an approach of validation of diagnostic test.

settingOutpatient prenatal care clinics from five tertiary maternity hospitals from three different Brazilian regions.

participants1165 pregnant women attending prenatal care services from 2015 to 2018 and with diverse ethnic characteristics who were enrolled at midpregnancy and followed in three visits at different gestational weeks. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratio and accuracy of MUAC being used instead of BMI for the assessment of nutritional status of women during pregnancy.

resultsWe found a strong correlation between MUAC and BMI, in the three set points analysed (r=0.872, 0.870 and 0.831, respectively). Based on BMI categories of nutritional status, we estimated the best MUAC cut-off points, finding measures according to each category: underweight <25.75 cm (19-39 weeks); overweight 28.11-30.15 cm (19-21 weeks), 28.71-30.60 cm (27-29 weeks) and 29.46-30.25 cm (37-39 weeks); and obese >30.15 cm (19-21 weeks), >30.60 cm (27-29 weeks) and >30.25 cm (37-39 weeks) per gestational week. Therefore, we defined as adequate between 25.75-28.10 cm (19-21 weeks), 25.75-28.70 cm (27-29 weeks) and 25.75-29.45 cm (37-39 weeks) of MUAC.

conclusionWe conclude that MUAC can be useful as a surrogate for BMI as a faster screening of nutritional status in pregnant women.

Indexed as

ArmNutritional StatusAnthropometryBody Mass IndexBrazilCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancymaternal medicinenutrition & dieteticsprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID34031116
PMCPMC8149442
OpenAlexW3165476634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.