ArticleBMJ case reports2021
Cerebral paradoxical embolisation in a patient with cystic fibrosis with patent foramen ovale: a comparative review of literature.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paradoxical embolisation in right-sided infective endocarditis and patent foramen ovale.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 52-year-old woman with cystic fibrosis presented to the emergency department with expressive aphasia and right-sided hemiparesis. CT scan of the brain revealed a left middle cerebral artery territory infarct. A diagnosis of cerebral paradoxical embolisation associated with patent foramen ovale and a history of deep venous thrombosis was made. The patient underwent endovascular thrombectomy and percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale. Current literature, including five published case reports, pertaining to the subject is discussed. The unique aspects of the case are highlighted, including the particular risk of cerebral paradoxical embolisation in patients with cystic fibrosis. The result of this case report, in context to previously reported literature, suggests that clinicians should be aware of paradoxical embolisation in patients with cystic fibrosis via an intracardiac shunt, particularly with implanted vascular access devices and a history of deep venous thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.