Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031053›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Bioavailability of Single-Dose SUBA-Itraconazole Compared to Conventional Itraconazole under Fasted and Fed Conditions.

Adriana M Rauseo, Patrick Mazi, Phoebe Lewis, Bruce Burnett, Stuart Mudge, Andrej Spec

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Blastomycosis-Some Progress but Still Much to Learn.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adriana M RauseoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Patrick MaziDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Phoebe LewisMayne Pharma, Medical Affairs, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Bruce BurnettMayne Pharma, Medical Affairs, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Stuart MudgeMayne Pharma, Medical Affairs, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Andrej SpecDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional itraconazole (C-ITZ) suffers from absorption variability. SUBA-itraconazole (S-ITZ) is more bioavailable than C-ITZ at steady state in a fed condition, but there are no data comparing the two under a fasted state. An open-label, single-dose, randomized, bioequivalence study was performed comparing S-ITZ to C-ITZ capsules under fasted and fed conditions in healthy adults measuring itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole plasma levels. This study demonstrated less variability of S-ITZ compared to C-ITZ capsules under fasted conditions.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsItraconazoleAdministration, OralAdultBiological AvailabilityFastingHumansAntifungal AgentsItraconazolebioavailabilityendemic mycosesitraconazolepharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID34031053
PMCPMC8284459
OpenAlexW3165697746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.