Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34031020›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with and without on-treatment high platelet reactivity: a SMART-CHOICE substudy.

Seung Hun Lee, Sang Yeub Lee, Woo Jung Chun, Young Bin Song, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Jin-Ok Jeong, Seok Kyu Oh, Kyeong Ho Yun, Young-Youp Koh, Jang-Whan Bae and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02079194 (Comparison Between P2Y12 Antagonist MonotHerapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients UndergOing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02079194 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison Between P2Y12 Antagonist MonotHerapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients UndergOing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2014 to 2020Enrolled3,000ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsP2Y12 antagonist monotherapy, aspirin plus P2Y12 antagonist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. P2YNature reviews. Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  3. P2YJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Is clopidogrel as the P2YEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Seung Hun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Yeub Lee
Woo Jung Chun
Young Bin Song
Seung-Hyuk Choi
Jin-Ok Jeong
Seok Kyu Oh
Kyeong Ho Yun
Young-Youp Koh
Jang-Whan Bae
Jae Woong Choi
Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Joo-Yong Hahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy has emerged as a promising alternative for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), there remains concern regarding the safety of clopidogrel monotherapy.

aimsWe sought to investigate clinical outcomes of clopidogrel monotherapy in patients with and without on-treatment high platelet reactivity (HPR).

methodsIn the SMART-CHOICE study, three-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was compared with 12-month DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. A platelet function test was performed for 833 patients with clopidogrel-based therapy. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) at 12 months.

resultsOverall, 108 (13.0%) patients had HPR on clopidogrel. Patients with HPR had a significantly higher rate of MACCE than patients without HPR (8.7% vs 1.5%, adjusted HR 3.036, 95% CI: 1.060-8.693, p=0.038). The treatment effect of clopidogrel monotherapy for the 12-month MACCE was not significantly different compared with DAPT among patients with HPR (8.0% vs 9.4%, adjusted HR 0.718, 95% CI: 0.189-2.737, p=0.628) and without HPR (2.2% vs 0.9%, adjusted HR 2.587, 95% CI: 0.684-9.779, p=0.161; adjusted p for interaction=0.170).

conclusionsClopidogrel monotherapy showed treatment effects comparable to DAPT for MACCE in patients with or without HPR. However, HPR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACCE in clopidogrel-treated patients regardless of maintenance of aspirin. CLINICAL

trial registrationComparison Between P2Y12 Antagonist Monotherapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After DES (SMART-CHOICE) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02079194).

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAspirinClopidogrelDual Anti-Platelet TherapyHumansTreatment OutcomeAspirinClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34031020
PMCPMC9724997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.