Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34030769›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

The discriminatory power of the T cell receptor.

Johannes Pettmann, Anna Huhn, Enas Abu Shah, Mikhail A Kutuzov, Daniel B Wilson, Michael L Dustin, Simon J Davis, P Anton van der Merwe, Omer Dushek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Design of solubly expressed miniaturized SMART MHCs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. T cell receptor specificity landscape revealed through de novo peptide design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Parallel reactions on a single T cell receptor offer a robust kinetic proofreading mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.

Johannes Pettmann *Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-8943
Anna Huhn *Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-4951
Enas Abu Shah *Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-8171
Mikhail A KutuzovSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-4350
Daniel B WilsonSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael L DustinKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-6389
Simon J DavisRadcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
P Anton van der MerweSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9902-6590
Omer DushekSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-5226
University of Oxford · GBBoston University · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G19/31Medical Research Council G9722488Wellcome Trust 098274/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 100262Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 203737/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 207537/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells use their T cell receptors (TCRs) to discriminate between lower-affinity self and higher-affinity non-self peptides presented on major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) antigens. Although the discriminatory power of the TCR is widely believed to be near-perfect, technical difficulties have hampered efforts to precisely quantify it. Here, we describe a method for measuring very low TCR/pMHC affinities and use it to measure the discriminatory power of the TCR and the factors affecting it. We find that TCR discrimination, although enhanced compared with conventional cell-surface receptors, is imperfect: primary human T cells can respond to pMHC with affinities as low as K

Indexed as

Antigen-Antibody ComplexHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSurface Plasmon ResonanceAntigen-Antibody ComplexPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellantigen discriminationcomputational biologyco-signalling receptorshumanimmunologyinflammationkinetic proofreadingmathematical modelsystems biologyT cell receptorT cells

Identifiers

PMID34030769
PMCPMC8219380
OpenAlexW3164671062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.