ArticleBMC medical education2021
Use of an evidence-based health portal to improve teaching and learning in primary care: a mixed methods evaluation.
Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorldwide, primary care is for most people the gateway into many health systems. Offering solutions to the demands of the communities served requires the constant preparation of professionals, especially doctors and medical undergraduate students. We analyze and propose ways to improve the teaching and learning processes facilitated by the Basic Family Health Units (BFHUs) based on the use of electronic portals with evidence-based medicine criteria.
methodFirst phase: The authors conducted a qualitative-quantitative study on students and instructors of primary care (PC) medicine by administering a survey of open- and closed-ended questions at medical schools. The closed-ended questions were studied with descriptive statistics, and open-ended questions were analyzed via the creation of categories. Perceptions of major teaching and learning problems were then identified. Second phase: Meetings were held with students and their instructors for 6 months and involved the use of electronic portals and the application of new questionnaires using a Likert scale for pre- and postevaluation.
resultsIn the first phase, 40% of the students considered local instructor training levels a problem. A similar result was found regarding teachers' lectures, revealing a lack of adequate PC training and performance. Building on our results, we focused on BFHUs to apply new strategies for teaching and learning, such as the use of the Evidence-Based Health (SBE) Portal, which includes several databases with clinical evidence criteria. In the second phase, the authors identified an improvement in the quality of learning among instructors and students. This outcome improved safety in daily clinical practice in PC, possibly with better results for its users.
conclusionsThe use of electronic portals can facilitate BFHU teaching and learning and promote the health of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.