Observational studyBMC medical education2021
Mismatch of corneal specialists' expectations and keratoconus knowledge in general ophthalmologists - a prospective observational study in Switzerland.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness of Keratoconus Among the Population of Taif City, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Experiences of keratoconus patients attending public eye care facilities in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024Article
- Comparing the influence of big data resources on medical knowledge recall for staff with and without medical collaboration platform.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Differences in minimal disease knowledge of keratoconus patients: results from an international survey.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Automated cornea diagnosis using deep convolutional neural networks based on cornea topography maps.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Knowledge about Prescribing Antibiotics as Prophylaxis in Patients with Open Globe Injury: A Survey in Iranian Ophthalmologists.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2023Article
- Online survey about keratoconus management by optometrists.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Keratoconus-A Narrative Review of Clinicians' Perspectives.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Self-reported knowledge and skills related to diagnosis and management of keratoconus among public sector optometrists in the Limpopo province, South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess whether Swiss general ophthalmologists have the minimal keratoconus knowledge that corneal specialists would expect them to have.
methodsCorneal specialists defined "minimal keratoconus knowledge" (MKK) with respect to definition, risk factors, symptoms and possible treatment options of keratoconus. A telephone interview survey was conducted among one hundred ophthalmologists (mean age 51.9 years (SD 9.5), 60 % male) from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For each participant, years of work experience, number of keratoconus patients seen per year and access to a topography device were obtained. We calculated the proportion of MKK and examined in multivariate analyses whether ophthalmologists with access to topography and with greater work experience performed better than other groups.
resultsNo single ophthalmologist had MKK. The mean MKK was 52.0 %, and the range was 28.6-81.0 %. Per 10 years of working in private practice, the MKK decreased by 8.1 % points (95 % CI: -14.2, -2.00; p = 0.01). Only 24 % of participants correctly recalled the definition of keratoconus, 9 % all risk factors, 5 % all symptoms and 20 % all treatment modalities. The MKK values were not associated with the number of keratoconus patients seen per year and the availability of topography to diagnose keratoconus.
conclusionsThere is a substantial mismatch between corneal specialist' expectations and general ophthalmologists' knowledge about keratoconus. The low recall of symptoms and risk factors may explain why ophthalmologists diagnose relatively few cases of keratoconus, resulting in inefficient care delivery and delayed intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.