Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34030546›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2022

Life-course trajectories of working conditions and successful ageing.

Charlotta Nilsen, Alexander Darin-Mattsson, Martin Hyde, Jonas W Wastesson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognitive reserve, cortisol, and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers: A memory clinic study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Trajectories of Successful Aging Among Older Adults in Aotearoa New Zealand.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotta NilsenAging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-5486
Alexander Darin-MattssonAging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin HydeCentre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jonas W WastessonAging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet/Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SESwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAs populations are ageing worldwide, it is important to identify strategies to promote successful ageing. We investigate how working conditions throughout working life are associated with successful ageing in later life.

methodsData from two nationally representative longitudinal Swedish surveys were linked (

resultsIntellectually stimulating work; that is, substantive complexity, in the beginning of one's career followed by an accumulation of more intellectually stimulating work throughout working life was associated with higher levels of successful ageing. In contrast, a history of stressful, hazardous or physically demanding work was associated with lower levels of successful ageing.

conclusions

Indexed as

AgingWorkplaceAgedEmploymentHumansOccupationsRetirementaccumulationde-accumulationlongitudinalphysical working conditionssubstantive complexitysuccessful ageingWork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID34030546
PMCPMC9203674
OpenAlexW3165257248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.