GuidelineGastroenterology2021
AGA Rapid Review and Guideline for SARS-CoV2 Testing and Endoscopy Post-Vaccination: 2021 Update.
Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Learning from an Emerging Infection: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Reshaped Gastric Cancer Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Cytosponge procedures produce fewer respiratory aerosols and droplets than esophagogastroduodenoscopies.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024Article
- Safety of Endoscopy Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis.Gastroenterologia y hepatologia · 2023Observational
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Indications, Findings, and Safety.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Risk-based decision-making related to preprocedural coronavirus disease 2019 testing in the setting of GI endoscopy: management of risks, evidence, and behavioral health economics.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- Management of aerosol generation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- The Safety of the Re-Opening of an Academic Medical Center Outpatient Endoscopy Unit During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Gastroenterology research · 2022Article
- Addressing postpandemic disruption in a safety net endoscopy unit.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Coronavirus Disease Transmission Prevented in an Endoscopy Unit with Universal Protective Measures and No Systematic Preprocedural Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Race-Based Clinical Recommendations in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Impaired tryptophan metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract of patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Is Detected in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Asymptomatic Endoscopy Patients but Is Unlikely to Pose a Significant Risk to Healthcare Personnel.Gastro hep advances · 2022Article
- Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2022Review
- [COVID-19 and endoscopy services].Der Gastroenterologe : Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This guideline provides updated recommendations on the role of preprocedure testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in individuals undergoing endoscopy in the post-vaccination period and replaces the prior guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) (released July 29, 2020). Since the start of the pandemic, our increased understanding of transmission has facilitated the implementation of practices to promote patient and health care worker (HCW) safety. Simultaneously, there has been increasing recognition of the potential harm associated with delays in patient care, as well as inefficiency of endoscopy units. With widespread vaccination of HCWs and the general population, a re-evaluation of AGA's prior recommendations was warranted. In order to update the role of preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2, the AGA guideline panel reviewed the evidence on prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infections in individuals undergoing endoscopy; patient and HCW risk of infections that may be acquired immediately before, during, or after endoscopy; effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in reducing risk of infections and transmission; patient and HCW anxiety; patient delays in care and potential impact on cancer burden; and endoscopy volumes. The panel considered the certainty of the evidence, weighed the benefits and harms of routine preprocedure testing, and considered burden, equity, and cost using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Based on very low certainty evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation against routine preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2 in patients scheduled to undergo endoscopy. The panel placed a high value on minimizing additional delays in patient care, acknowledging the reduced endoscopy volumes, downstream impact on delayed cancer diagnoses, and burden of testing on patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.