Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34029569›Full record

GuidelineGastroenterology2021

AGA Rapid Review and Guideline for SARS-CoV2 Testing and Endoscopy Post-Vaccination: 2021 Update.

Shahnaz Sultan, Shazia M Siddique, Siddharth Singh, Osama Altayar, Angela M Caliendo, Perica Davitkov, Joseph D Feuerstein, Vivek Kaul, Joseph K Lim, Reem A Mustafa and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cytosponge procedures produce fewer respiratory aerosols and droplets than esophagogastroduodenoscopies.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  4. Safety of Endoscopy Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endoscopy After the COVID-19 Pandemic-What Will Be Different?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  16. [COVID-19 and endoscopy services].Der Gastroenterologe : Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Shahnaz SultanDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: sdemian@gastro.org.
Shazia M SiddiqueDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Siddharth SinghDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Osama AltayarDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Angela M CaliendoDepartment of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Perica DavitkovDivision of Gastroenterology, Northeast Ohio Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Joseph D FeuersteinDivision of Gastroenterology and Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vivek KaulDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Joseph K LimYale Liver Center and Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Reem A MustafaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Yngve Falck-YtterDivision of Gastroenterology, Northeast Ohio Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
John M InadomiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
American Gastroenterological Association
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrown University · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USVA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Comparative Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Therapies for Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesK23DK117058 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SINGH, SIDDHARTH · 2018 to 2022
$971k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK117058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This guideline provides updated recommendations on the role of preprocedure testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in individuals undergoing endoscopy in the post-vaccination period and replaces the prior guideline from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) (released July 29, 2020). Since the start of the pandemic, our increased understanding of transmission has facilitated the implementation of practices to promote patient and health care worker (HCW) safety. Simultaneously, there has been increasing recognition of the potential harm associated with delays in patient care, as well as inefficiency of endoscopy units. With widespread vaccination of HCWs and the general population, a re-evaluation of AGA's prior recommendations was warranted. In order to update the role of preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2, the AGA guideline panel reviewed the evidence on prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV2 infections in individuals undergoing endoscopy; patient and HCW risk of infections that may be acquired immediately before, during, or after endoscopy; effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in reducing risk of infections and transmission; patient and HCW anxiety; patient delays in care and potential impact on cancer burden; and endoscopy volumes. The panel considered the certainty of the evidence, weighed the benefits and harms of routine preprocedure testing, and considered burden, equity, and cost using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Based on very low certainty evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation against routine preprocedure testing for SARS-CoV2 in patients scheduled to undergo endoscopy. The panel placed a high value on minimizing additional delays in patient care, acknowledging the reduced endoscopy volumes, downstream impact on delayed cancer diagnoses, and burden of testing on patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19EndoscopyPandemicsCOVID-19 VaccinesGastroenterologyHumansMass ScreeningSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Diagnostic TestGastrointestinal EndoscopySARS-CoV2

Identifiers

PMID34029569
PMCPMC8139430
OpenAlexW3160339109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.