Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34029456›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2021

Rajnish Kumar, Hamed Massoumi, Manjyot Kaur Chug, Elizabeth J Brisbois

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fluorescent small molecule donors.Chemical Society reviews · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Smartphone compatible nitric oxide releasing insert to prevent catheter-associated infections.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajnish KumarSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Hamed MassoumiSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Manjyot Kaur ChugSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Elizabeth J BrisboisSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-5448
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Bioinspired antifouling and thromboresistant polymers for blood-contacting interfacesR01HL151473 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI BRISBOIS, ELIZABETH JOY · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial-lock therapy is an economically viable strategy to prevent/reduce the catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) that are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). Herein, we report the synthesis and characterization of the

Indexed as

AcetylcysteineAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEstersHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAcetylcysteineAnti-Bacterial AgentsEstersS-nitroso-N-acetylcysteineantibacterial interfacesantimicrobial-lock therapy (ALT)catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI)nitric oxide (NO)S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine (SNACET)

Identifiers

PMID34029456
PMCPMC8735666
OpenAlexW3164130834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.