ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Genome-scale metabolic modelling when changes in environmental conditions affect biomass composition.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Objectives and Trade-Offs: Inference and Applications.Metabolites · 2025Review
- BioModTool: from biomass composition data to structured biomass objective functions for genome-scale metabolic models.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Genome-scale metabolic models reveal determinants of phenotypic differences in non-Saccharomyces yeasts.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Balancing biomass reaction stoichiometry and measured fluxes in flux balance analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Pichia pastoris growth-coupled heme biosynthesis analysis using metabolic modelling.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Growth phase estimation for abundant bacterial populations sampled longitudinally from human stool metagenomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Mitigating biomass composition uncertainties in flux balance analysis using ensemble representations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- A study of a diauxic growth experiment using an expanded dynamic flux balance framework.PloS one · 2023Article
- Experimental determination of Escherichia coli biomass composition for constraint-based metabolic modeling.PloS one · 2022Article
- Addressing uncertainty in genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction and analysis.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Recent advances in culture medium design for enhanced production of monoclonal antibodies in CHO cells: A comparative study of machine learning and systems biology approaches.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-scale metabolic modeling is an important tool in the study of metabolism by enhancing the collation of knowledge, interpretation of data, and prediction of metabolic capabilities. A frequent assumption in the use of genome-scale models is that the in vivo organism is evolved for optimal growth, where growth is represented by flux through a biomass objective function (BOF). While the specific composition of the BOF is crucial, its formulation is often inherited from similar organisms due to the experimental challenges associated with its proper determination. A cell's macro-molecular composition is not fixed and it responds to changes in environmental conditions. As a consequence, initiatives for the high-fidelity determination of cellular biomass composition have been launched. Thus, there is a need for a mathematical and computational framework capable of using multiple measurements of cellular biomass composition in different environments. Here, we propose two different computational approaches for directly addressing this challenge: Biomass Trade-off Weighting (BTW) and Higher-dimensional-plane InterPolation (HIP). In lieu of experimental data on biomass composition-variation in response to changing nutrient environment, we assess the properties of BTW and HIP using three hypothetical, yet biologically plausible, BOFs for the Escherichia coli genome-scale metabolic model iML1515. We find that the BTW and HIP formulations have a significant impact on model performance and phenotypes. Furthermore, the BTW method generates larger growth rates in all environments when compared to HIP. Using acetate secretion and the respiratory quotient as proxies for phenotypic changes, we find marked differences between the methods as HIP generates BOFs more similar to a reference BOF than BTW. We conclude that the presented methods constitute a conceptual step in developing genome-scale metabolic modelling approaches capable of addressing the inherent dependence of cellular biomass composition on nutrient environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.